Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?
- PMID: 19136232
- DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009
Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?
Abstract
We evaluated early mortality (<30 days) rates, cost analyses, and preoperative variables that may be predictive of 30-day mortality in elderly patients compared to younger patients after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The survey is a retrospective analysis based on prospectively registered data. The protocol was an "all-comers" policy. Seventy-two patients, who were operated on for RAAA in our department from January 1, 2005, to December 30, 2005, are included in this study. The follow-up time of survivors was 1 year. We defined 75-year-old patients as elderly because of the increased incidence of surgical risk factors and hospital mortality in this subset of patients (cut-off age). Demographic, clinical, and operative factors were analyzed together with 30-day mortality. Univariate analysis was performed with the chi-squared test. Multivariate analyses were also performed with the variables that were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. Health economy and cost analysis for the two groups were estimated. Out of 72 open repairs of RAAA, 44 patients (61%) were under 75 years of age and 28 (39%) were 75 years or older. The average age of the patients was 71 years (confidence interval [CI] 69.2-73.7, range 53-87). Twenty-five patients (35%, CI 27.6-51.2) died within 30 days in the postoperative period. The 30-day mortality for the 28 elderly patients who underwent open operative repair was 16 (57%, CI 48%-72%) compared to 9 (20%, CI 12%-33%) of 44 younger patients (p < 0.001). An age of 75 years or older and a serum creatinine >or=0.150 mmol/L in elderly patients with RAAA (p < 0.01) were identified to be significant risk factors for operative mortality. We did not encounter significant differences in the distribution of other risk factors in the group of elderly patients compared to the younger group. Between the survivors of the two groups, there were no significant differences in the total length of stay (LOS) and the LOS in the intensive care unit. Advanced age (>or=75) and the combination of this advanced age and serum creatinine of >or=0.150 mmol/L were the only significant (p < 0.05) preoperative risk factors in our single-center study. However, we believe that treatment for RAAA can be justified in elderly patients. In our experience, surgical open repair has been life-saving in 33% of patients aged 75 years and older, at a relatively low price for each life, estimated at euro 40,409.
Similar articles
-
Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume.J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 14. J Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19147323
-
Outcome in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after open surgical repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Apr;44(3):170-3. doi: 10.1177/1538574410361972. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010. PMID: 20308171
-
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18411029
-
Successful surgical repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a nonagenarian.Int Angiol. 2001 Dec;20(4):351-3. Int Angiol. 2001. PMID: 11782704 Review.
-
A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Br J Surg. 2002 Jun;89(6):714-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02122.x. Br J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12027981 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute kidney injury in elderly intensive care patients: a review.Intensive Care Med. 2010 Sep;36(9):1454-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1957-7. Epub 2010 Jul 15. Intensive Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20631983 Review.
-
Similar long-term outcomes between endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarian patients: a single-center study.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Dec;103(6):372-377. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.6.372. Epub 2022 Dec 8. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022. PMID: 36601339 Free PMC article.
-
The Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Terms of Safety and Efficacy on the Basis of a Single-Center 30-Year Experience.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 20;12(22):7186. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227186. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002798 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management in elderly patients with rectal cancer aged 70 and older.J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Oct-Dec;19(4):504-510. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_243_22. J Minim Access Surg. 2023. PMID: 37282434 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources