Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;19(5):1148-55.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1255-8. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT

Affiliations

Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT

Patrick A Hein et al. Eur Radiol. 2009 May.

Abstract

We sought to determine the feasibility and image quality of 320-slice volume computed tomography (CT) angiography for the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. Thirty consecutive patients (11 female, 19 male, mean age 63.2 +/- 14.2 years) with noncritical, acute chest pain underwent 320-slice CT using a protocol consisting of a nonspiral, nongated CT of the entire chest, followed by a nonspiral, electrocardiography-gated CT study of the heart. Data were acquired following a biphasic intravenous injection of 90 ml iodinated contrast agent. Vessel attenuation values of different thoracic vascular territories were recorded, and image quality scored on a five-point scale by two readers. Mean attenuation was 467 +/- 69 HU in the ascending aorta, 334 +/- 52 HU in the aortic arch, 455 +/- 71 HU in the descending aorta, 492 +/- 94 HU in the pulmonary trunk, and 416 +/- 63 HU and 436 +/- 62 HU in the right and left coronary artery, respectively. Radiation exposure estimates ranged between 7 and 14 mSv. The CT protocol investigated enabled imaging of the thoracic aorta, coronary and pulmonary arteries with an excellent diagnostic quality for chest pain triage in all patients. This result was achieved with less contrast material and reduced radiation exposure compared with previously investigated imaging protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Circulation. 2006 Nov 21;114(21):2251-60 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1239-55 - PubMed
    1. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;25(3):367-75 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17(12):3179-88 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2008 Apr;18(4):773-80 - PubMed