Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Dec;170(6):721-35.
doi: 10.1667/RR1231.1.

Risk of hematological malignancies among Chernobyl liquidators

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Risk of hematological malignancies among Chernobyl liquidators

Ausrele Kesminiene et al. Radiat Res. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

A case-control study of hematological malignancies was conducted among Chernobyl liquidators (accident recovery workers) from Belarus, Russia and Baltic countries to assess the effect of low- to medium-dose protracted radiation exposures on the relative risk of these diseases. The study was nested within cohorts of liquidators who had worked around the Chernobyl plant in 1986-1987. A total of 117 cases [69 leukemia, 34 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 14 other malignancies of lymphoid and hematopoietic tissue] and 481 matched controls were included in the study. Individual dose to the bone marrow and uncertainties were estimated for each subject. The main analyses were restricted to 70 cases (40 leukemia, 20 NHL and 10 other) and their 287 matched controls with reliable information on work in the Chernobyl area. Most subjects received very low doses (median 13 mGy). For all diagnoses combined, a significantly elevated OR was seen at doses of 200 mGy and above. The excess relative risk (ERR) per 100 mGy was 0.60 [90% confidence interval (CI) -0.02, 2.35]. The corresponding estimate for leukemia excluding chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) was 0.50 (90% CI -0.38, 5.7). It is slightly higher than but statistically compatible with those estimated from A-bomb survivors and recent low-dose-rate studies. Although sensitivity analyses showed generally similar results, we cannot rule out the possibility that biases and uncertainties could have led to over- or underestimation of the risk in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of total RBM dose among study subjects (overall, by country, and by case-control status) (results based on the main data set 2)
Figure 2
Figure 2
. Comparison of odds ratios (ORs) predicted by different risk models with categorical odds ratios estimated in 6 dose categories (results based on the main data set 4) ◆ OR and 95% CI formula image Log-linear model – linear dose-response formula image Log-linear model – linear-quadratic dose-response formula image ERR model – linear dose-response formula image ERR model – linear-quadratic dose-response
Figure 3
Figure 3
Profile likelihood, MLE and 90% CI for β from both the unsimulated data and the 10,000 simulations, using the log-linear model - All hematological malignancies combined (results based on the main data set 5)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Profile likelihood, MLE and 90% CI for β from both the unsimulated data and the 10,000 simulations, using the linear ERR model - All hematological malignancies combined (results based on the main data set 6)

References

    1. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation - Volume II Effects. United Nations; New York: 2000.
    1. US NRC. Health Risks from exposures to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences; 2006. Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation.
    1. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Recommendations of the International Commission for Radiation Protection. Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2/3) - PubMed
    1. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, Howe G, Kaldor J, Muirhead CR, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005;331:77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, Howe G, Kaldor J, Muirhead CR, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167:396–416. - PubMed

Publication types