Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;1(4):250-4.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0060.

An expanded risk prediction model for lung cancer

Affiliations

An expanded risk prediction model for lung cancer

Margaret R Spitz et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Risk prediction models are useful in clinical decision making. We have published an internally validated prediction tool for lung cancer based on easily obtainable epidemiologic and clinical data. Because the precision of the model was modest, we now estimate the improvement obtained by adding two markers of DNA repair capacity. Assay data (host-cell reactivation and mutagen sensitivity) were available for 725 White lung cancer cases and 615 controls, all former or current smokers, a subset of cases and controls from the previous analysis. Multivariable models were constructed from the original variables with addition of the biomarkers separately and together. Pairwise comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and 3-fold cross-validations were done. For former smokers, the AUC and 95% confidence intervals were 0.67 (0.63-0.71) for the baseline model and 0.70 (0.66-0.74) for the expanded model. For current smokers, the comparable AUC values were 0.68 (0.64-0.72) and 0.73 (0.69-0.77). For both groups, the expanded models were statistically significantly better than the baseline models (P = 0.006 and P = 0.0048, respectively), although the increases in the concordance statistics were modest. We also recomputed 1-year absolute risks of lung cancer as described previously for two different risk profiles and showed that individuals who exhibited poor repair capacity or heightened mutagen sensitivity had increased absolute risks of lung cancer. Addition of biomarker assays improved the sensitivity of the expanded models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Comment in

  • Lung cancer risk models come of age.
    Field JK. Field JK. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Sep;1(4):226-8. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0144. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008. PMID: 19138964 No abstract available.

References

    1. Spitz MR, Hong WK, Amos CI, et al. A risk model for prediction of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:715–26. - PubMed
    1. Wei Q, Cheng L, Amos CI, et al. Repair of tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a molecular epidemiologic study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1764–72. - PubMed
    1. Spitz MR, Wei Q, Dong Q, Amos CI, Wu X. Genetic susceptibility to lung cancer: the role of DNA damage and repair. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:689–98. - PubMed
    1. Wu X, Lin J, Etzel CJ, et al. Interplay between mutagen sensitivity and epidemiological factors in modulating lung cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2687–95. - PubMed
    1. Athas WF, Hedayati MA, Matanoski GM, Farmer ER, Grossman L. Development and field-test validation of an assay for DNA repair in circulating human lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 1991;51:5786–93. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms