The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site
- PMID: 19144324
- PMCID: PMC2663382
- DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.12.002
The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site
Abstract
Objectives: Surgical periosteal injury and masticatory loading are likely factors affecting the healing of a mandibular DO site. This study is aimed to characterize the healing features of an early-phase mandibular DO site and assess the effects of these factors.
Design: Eighteen 3-6-month-old miniature pigs received a right mandibular osteotomy and were distracted for 5 days (1 mm/day) and consolidated for 0, 1 or 2 weeks (Groups A, B and C, respectively). Bone formation, chondrogenesis and vascular structure of the distraction site were measured using histological methods and their changes with consolidation time were characterized. The effect of periosteal injury was assessed by comparing the more severely injured lateral side with the less disturbed medial side. The effect of masticatory loading was evaluated by relating the healing features to the interfragmentary micromovement caused by soft-diet mastication.
Results: With consolidation time, bone formation and chondrogenesis became stronger whilst vascular structure became more mature. Compared to the medial side, bone formation and chondrogenesis on the lateral side were significantly delayed in Groups A and B, but not in Group C, in which periosteal recovery had occurred. No difference was found for vascular measurements between the medial and lateral sides. In Group B, bone formation, but not chondrogenesis or vascular structures, tended to be negatively correlated with the magnitude of masticatory micromovement during the distraction phase.
Conclusion: The results suggest that periosteal injury inhibits early mandibular DO site healing, whereas micromovement from soft-diet mastication mechanics has a negligible effect.
Figures






References
-
- McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(1):1–8. discussion 9–10. - PubMed
-
- Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop. 1990;(250):8–26. - PubMed
-
- Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop. 1989;(239):263–285. - PubMed
-
- al Ruhaimi KA. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(3):220–227. - PubMed
-
- Farhadieh RD, Gianoutsos MP, Dickinson R, Walsh WR. Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):889–895. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources