Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMID: 19144937
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Background: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding the placement of the stent. It is unclear whether routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR; the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow), in addition to angiography, improves outcomes.
Methods: In 20 medical centers in the United States and Europe, we randomly assigned 1005 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo PCI with implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements in addition to angiography. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified on the basis of their angiographic appearance. Patients assigned to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those assigned to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80 or less. The primary end point was the rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year.
Results: The mean (+/-SD) number of indicated lesions per patient was 2.7+/-0.9 in the angiography group and 2.8+/-1.0 in the FFR group (P=0.34). The number of stents used per patient was 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.9+/-1.3, respectively (P<0.001). The 1-year event rate was 18.3% (91 patients) in the angiography group and 13.2% (67 patients) in the FFR group (P=0.02). Seventy-eight percent of the patients in the angiography group were free from angina at 1 year, as compared with 81% of patients in the FFR group (P=0.20).
Conclusions: Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267774.)
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Refining the art and science of coronary stenting.N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):292-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0809422. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19144945 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve for guiding PCI.N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):2024; author reply 2026-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc090286. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19420374 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve for guiding PCI.N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):2024-5; author reply 2026-7. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19425191 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve for guiding PCI.N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):2025-6; author reply 2026-7. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19425236 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI reduced major adverse cardiac outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI in multivessel CAD.Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):JC5-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-10-200905190-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19451563 No abstract available.
-
Optymalizacja zabiegów angioplastyki wieńcowej u osób z wielonaczyniowa choroba wieńcowa za pomcoca czastkowej rezerwy wieńcowej korzystniejsza niz implantacja stentów pokrywanych lekiem -- wyniki badania FAME.Kardiol Pol. 2009 Sep;67(9):1052-3. Kardiol Pol. 2009. PMID: 19938367 Polish. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous