Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review
- PMID: 19147479
- PMCID: PMC2628300
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a3162
Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the impact of a system of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates and to review data on attitudes towards presumed consent.
Design: Systematic review.
Data sources: Studies retrieved by online searches to January 2008 of Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, PAIS International, and OpenSIGLE. Studies reviewed Five studies comparing donation rates before and after the introduction of legislation for presumed consent (before and after studies); eight studies comparing donation rates in countries with and without presumed consent systems (between country comparisons); 13 surveys of public and professional attitudes to presumed consent.
Results: The five before and after studies represented three countries: all reported an increase in donation rates after the introduction of presumed consent, but there was little investigation of any other changes taking place concurrently with the change in legislation. In the four best quality between country comparisons, presumed consent law or practice was associated with increased organ donation-increases of 25-30%, 21-26%, 2.7 more donors per million population, and 6.14 more donors per million population in the four studies. Other factors found to be important in at least one study were mortality from road traffic accidents and cerebrovascular causes, transplant capacity, gross domestic product per capita, health expenditure per capita, religion (Catholicism), education, public access to information, and a common law legal system. Eight surveys of attitudes to presumed consent were of the UK public. These surveys varied in the level of support for presumed consent, with surveys conducted before 2000 reporting the lowest levels of support (28-57%). The most recent survey, in 2007, reported that 64% of respondents supported a change to presumed consent.
Conclusion: Presumed consent alone is unlikely to explain the variation in organ donation rates between countries. Legislation, availability of donors, organisation and infrastructure of the transplantation service, wealth and investment in health care, and public attitudes to and awareness of organ donation may all play a part, but their relative importance is unclear. Recent UK surveys show support for presumed consent, though with variation in results that may reflect differences in survey methods.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19422754
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
An ex-ante cost-utility analysis of the deemed consent legislation compared to expressed consent for kidney transplantations in Nova Scotia.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Oct 6;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00390-z. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022. PMID: 36199099 Free PMC article.
-
Is there an association between consent rates in Swiss hospitals and critical care staffs' attitudes towards organ donation, their knowledge and confidence in the donation process?PLoS One. 2019 Feb 8;14(2):e0211614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211614. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30735508 Free PMC article.
-
Consent for the use of human biological samples for biomedical research: a mixed methods study exploring the UK public's preferences.BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 7;3(8):e003022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003022. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 23929914 Free PMC article.
-
An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study.BMC Med. 2014 Sep 24;12:131. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 25285666 Free PMC article.
-
[Presumed consent for organ donation? : A survey among members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Apr;115(3):239-244. doi: 10.1007/s00063-019-0579-2. Epub 2019 Apr 10. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020. PMID: 30969352 German.
References
-
- Organ Donation Taskforce. Organs for transplants: a report from the Organ Donation Taskforce. London: Department of Health, 2008.
-
- British Medical Association. Organ donation in the 21st century: time for a consolidated approach. London: BMA, 2000.
-
- Transplant Committee of the Council of Europe. International data on organ donation and transplantation, waiting list and family refusals. Year 2007. Newsletter Transplant 2008;13:23-35.
-
- Sipes DD. Does it matter whether there is public policy for presumed consent in organ transplantation? Whittier Law Rev 1991;12:505-35. - PubMed
-
- Rithalia A, McDaid C, Suekarran S, Norman G, Myers L, Sowden A. A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation. Health Technol Assess (in press). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources