Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;21(1):2-8.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn054.

Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework

Affiliations

Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework

World Alliance For Patient Safety Drafting Group et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Global advances in patient safety have been hampered by the lack of a uniform classification of patient safety concepts. This is a significant barrier to developing strategies to reduce risk, performing evidence-based research and evaluating existing healthcare policies relevant to patient safety. Since 2005, the World Health Organization's World Alliance for Patient Safety has undertaken the Project to Develop an International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) to devise a classification which transforms patient safety information collected from disparate systems into a common format to facilitate aggregation, analysis and learning across disciplines, borders and time. A drafting group, comprised of experts from the fields of patient safety, classification theory, health informatics, consumer/patient advocacy, law and medicine, identified and defined key patient safety concepts and developed an internationally agreed conceptual framework for the ICPS based upon existing patient safety classifications. The conceptual framework was iteratively improved through technical expert meetings and a two-stage web-based modified Delphi survey of over 250 international experts. This work culminated in a conceptual framework consisting of ten high level classes: incident type, patient outcomes, patient characteristics, incident characteristics, contributing factors/hazards, organizational outcomes, detection, mitigating factors, ameliorating actions and actions taken to reduce risk. While the framework for the ICPS is in place, several challenges remain. Concepts need to be defined, guidance for using the classification needs to be provided, and further real-world testing needs to occur to progressively refine the ICPS to ensure it is fit for purpose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for the ICPS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mitigating factors.

References

    1. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 109. vol. 2., 10th Revision.
    1. Fifty-Fifth World Health Assembly. 2002 Res. WHA55.18. 18 May.
    1. Perneger T. Borges on classification. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;28:264–65. - PubMed
    1. Chang A, Schyve P, Croteau R, O'Leary D, Loeb J. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:95–105. - PubMed
    1. The National Reporting and Learning System. National Health Service, National Patient Safety Agency. http://www.npsa.nhs.uk. (14 August 2007, date last accessed)

Publication types

MeSH terms