Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Nov;9(4):719-32.

Imaging of the atlas (C1) and axis (C2)

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1915044
Review

Imaging of the atlas (C1) and axis (C2)

G L Ellis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1991 Nov.

Abstract

In imaging the atlantoaxial region in injured patients, the initial modality is plain radiography. The lateral C-spine as well as the open-mouth view are essential in this regard. On these views, it is not only important to examine the bony contour but also to look for indirect signs of injury such as prevertebral soft-tissue swelling, air in the prevertebral space, an increased width of the anterior atlantodental interval, and overriding of the C1-C2 joint on one side (the so-called wink sign of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation). In patients in whom there is a high index of suspicion for occult trauma, but without fractures suggested or adequately visualized on routine films, or in those with severe cranial trauma, further studies should be pursued. CT scan is the modality of choice in optimally imaging the bony contours of the axis and atlas. It has limitations in visualizing transversely oriented fractures such as high dens fractures, transverse fractures of the facet joints (although widening of the facet joint is an indirect indication of facet fracture), or transverse arch fractures. Plain tomography may better demonstrate such transverse fractures but has several disadvantages. Plain tomography is often not as readily available as CT; it requires that the patient be placed in lateral decubitus position to obtain lateral tomograms, which may be contraindicated in such clinical circumstances; and it is not as easy to appreciate three-dimensional relationships on plain tomography as it is on CT. CT clearly defines the location of displaced bone fragments in relationship to the spinal canal as well as often demonstrating disc injuries. Ligamentous injury, though potentially visualized directly on MR imaging, is more commonly addressed with flexion-extension films. Flexion-extension studies should, obviously, be performed only in awake, oriented patients who are without neurologic deficit, and the studies should be done with close physician supervision and stopped at the first onset of pain. MR imaging may be helpful in demonstrating soft-tissue injuries such as hemorrhage, disc herniation, nerve root impingement, and direct spinal cord damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources