Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Feb;108(2):549-53.
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc35b.

The efficacy of perfusion index as an indicator for intravascular injection of epinephrine-containing epidural test dose in propofol-anesthetized adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy of perfusion index as an indicator for intravascular injection of epinephrine-containing epidural test dose in propofol-anesthetized adults

Hany A Mowafi et al. Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Perfusion index (PI) is a noninvasive numerical value of peripheral perfusion obtained from a pulse oximeter. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of PI for detecting intravascular injection of a simulated epidural test dose containing 15 mug of epinephrine in adults during propofol-based anesthesia and compared its reliability with the conventional heart rate (HR) (positive if >or=10 bpm) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (positive if >or=15 mm Hg) criteria.

Methods: Forty patients scheduled for elective general surgery under total IV anesthesia were randomized to receive either 3 mL of lidocaine 15 mg/mL with epinephrine 5 microg/mL or 3 mL of saline IV (n = 20 each). HR, SBP, and PI were monitored for 5 min after injection.

Results: Injecting the test dose resulted in an average maximum PI decrease by 65% +/- 13% at 39 +/- 15 s. Moreover, maximal increases in HR and SBP were 19 +/- 8 bpm at 49 +/- 25 s and 17 +/- 7 mm Hg at 102 +/- 34 s after test dose injections, respectively. Using the PI criterion for intravascular injection (positive if PI decreases >or=10% from the preinjection value) the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]; CI = 83%-100%). On the contrary, sensitivities of 95% (CI = 76%-99%) and 90% (CI = 70%-97%) were obtained based on HR and SBP criteria, respectively.

Conclusion: PI is a reliable alternative to conventional hemodynamic criteria for detection of an intravascular injection of epidural test dose in propofol-anesthetized adult patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types