Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009;35(1):28-33.
doi: 10.1080/00952990802342899.

A meta-analysis of retention in methadone maintenance by dose and dosing strategy

Yan-Ping Bao  1 , Zhi-Min Liu, David H Epstein, Cun Du, Jie Shi, Lin Lu
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of retention in methadone maintenance by dose and dosing strategy

Yan-Ping Bao et al. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate, via meta-analysis, the influence of different methadone dose ranges and dosing strategies on retention rates in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT).

Methods: A systematic literature search identified 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating methadone dose and retention. Retention was defined as the percentage of patients remaining in treatment at a specified time point. After initial univariate analyses of retention by Pearson chi-squares, we used multilevel logistic regression to calculate summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the effects of methadone dose (above or below 60 mg/day), flexible vs. fixed dosing strategy, and duration of follow-up.

Results: The total number of opioid-dependent participants in the 18 studies was 2831, with 1797 in MMT and 1034 receiving alternative mediations or placebo. Each variable significantly predicted retention with the other variables controlled for. Retention was greater with methadone doses > or = 60 than with doses < 60 (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.43-2.11). Similarly, retention was greater with flexible-dose strategies than with fixed-dose strategies (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.41-2.11).

Conclusions: Higher doses of methadone and individualization of doses are each independently associated with better retention in MMT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

    1. Dole VP, Nyswander ME, Kreek MJ. Narcotic blockade. Arch Intern Med. 1966;118(4):304–309. - PubMed
    1. Strain EC, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA, Stitzer ML. Moderate- vs. High-dose methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(11):1000–1005. - PubMed
    1. Dole VP, Robinson JW, Orraca J, Towns E, Searcy P, Caine E. Methadone treatment of randomly selected criminal addicts. N Engl J Med. 1969;19:1372–1375. - PubMed
    1. Dole VP, Nyswander ME. A medical treatment for diacetylmorphine (heroin) addiction: A clinical trial with methadone hydrochloride. JAMA. 1965;193(8):80–84. - PubMed
    1. Metzger DS, Woody GE, McLellan AT, O’Brien CP, Druley P, Navaline H, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus seroconversion among intravenous drug users in- and out-of-treatment: an 18-month prospective follow-up. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993;6(9):1049–1056. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms