Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview
- PMID: 19152571
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00327.x
Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview
Abstract
Background: This overview critically compares subjective assessment tools and available objective measurement tools with potential devices becoming available. Our goal is to lay out the benefits of each scar assessment scale in order to propose good management skills for scars along with strong metric skills.
Methods: Classifying a scar is important in daily clinical practice. Ultimately choosing which treatment modality best fits can become a challenge. Scar classification needs a more detailed and systematic approach. We researched all different factors contributing to scar formation to come up with a more detailed criteria. Such factors included pigmentation/vascularity, surface texture, surface area, thickness (scar height), and pliability.
Results: Few studies have assessed scars; each provided an assessment scale of their own. Each scale is compared on the basis of accuracy, reliability, convenience in terms of feasibility and price.
Conclusions: There remains still no ideal objective measurement out there despite promise seen in subjective evaluation. Method refinement will however accelerate our knowledge and interventions - based on increasing study power with enhanced metrics.
Similar articles
-
A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.Laryngoscope. 2009 May;119(5):841-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.20139. Laryngoscope. 2009. PMID: 19266588 Clinical Trial.
-
Quantitative evaluation of elderly skin based on digital image analysis.Skin Res Technol. 2008 May;14(2):192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00278.x. Skin Res Technol. 2008. PMID: 18412562
-
Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?Burns. 2004 Mar;30(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.09.029. Burns. 2004. PMID: 15019115
-
How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2055-63. doi: 10.3109/09638280902874196. Disabil Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19888834 Review.
-
A review of current objective and subjective scar assessment tools.J Wound Care. 2008 Mar;17(3):101-2, 104-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.3.28666. J Wound Care. 2008. PMID: 18376650 Review.
Cited by
-
What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Burns. 2015. PMID: 26141527 Free PMC article.
-
Post-skin incision scar tissue assessment using patient and observer scar assessment scales: A randomised controlled trial.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 1;71:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103006. eCollection 2021 Nov. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34840756 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Condensed Nanofat Combined With Fat Grafts to Treat Atrophic Scars.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Mar 1;20(2):128-135. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1329. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 28975248 Free PMC article.
-
The modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a novel approach to defining pathologic and nonpathologic scarring.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan;127(1):242-247. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f959e8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21200219 Free PMC article.
-
Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment.RSC Adv. 2018 Mar 6;8(18):9661-9669. doi: 10.1039/c7ra12693j. eCollection 2018 Mar 5. RSC Adv. 2018. PMID: 35540841 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical