Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
- PMID: 19152695
- PMCID: PMC2639545
- DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-3
Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
Abstract
Background: Adherential pathology is the most common cause of small bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction does not have a clear role yet; surely it doesn't always represent only a therapeutic act, but it is always a diagnostic act, which doesn't interfere with abdominal wall integrity.
Methods: We performed a review without any language restrictions considering international literature indexed from 1980 to 2007 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We analyzed the reference lists of the key manuscripts. We also added a review based on international non-indexed sources.
Results: The feasibility of diagnostic laparoscopy is high (60-100%), while that of therapeutic laparoscopy is low (40-88%). The frequency of laparotomic conversions is variable ranging from 0 to 52%, depending on patient selection and surgical skill. The first cause of laparotomic conversion is a difficult exposition and treatment of band adhesions. The incidence of laparotomic conversions is major in patients with anterior peritoneal band adhesions. Other main causes for laparotomic conversion are the presence of bowel necrosis and accidental enterotomies. The predictive factors for successful laparoscopic adhesiolysis are: number of previous laparotomies </= 2, non-median previous laparotomy, appendectomy as previous surgical treatment causing adherences, unique band adhesion as phatogenetic mechanism of small bowel obstruction, early laparoscopic management within 24 hours from the onset of symptoms, no signs of peritonitis on physical examination, experience of the surgeon.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction is feasible but can be convenient only if performed by skilled surgeons in selected patients. The laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction is satisfactorily carried out when early indicated in patients with a low number of laparotomies resulting in a short hospital stay and a lower postoperative morbidity. Although a higher small bowel obstruction recurrence remains the major postoperative risk of the laparoscopic management of these patients.
Similar articles
-
[Role of laparoscopy in acute obstruction of the small bowel: personal experience and analysis of the literature].Chir Ital. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):39-46. Chir Ital. 2009. PMID: 19391338 Italian.
-
Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.World J Surg. 2006 Apr;30(4):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7778-0. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16555020 Review.
-
[Laparoscopy in small bowel ileus].Chirurg. 2000 May;71(5):518-23. doi: 10.1007/s001040050849. Chirurg. 2000. PMID: 10875007 Review. German.
-
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: not for all patients, not for all surgeons, not in all centres.Updates Surg. 2018 Dec;70(4):557-561. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0534-4. Epub 2018 May 16. Updates Surg. 2018. PMID: 29767333 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases.Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1945-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9575-3. Epub 2007 Sep 19. Surg Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17879114 Review.
Cited by
-
A retrospective study of laparoscopic surgery for small bowel obstruction.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Mar 1;16:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.045. eCollection 2017 Apr. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017. PMID: 28316782 Free PMC article.
-
Diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage as an alternative to colectomy for fulminant Clostridioides difficile: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jan;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03447-3. Epub 2019 Nov 21. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 31748820
-
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer.J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(4):321-334. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_155_17. J Minim Access Surg. 2018. PMID: 29483373 Free PMC article.
-
Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy does not affect immediate operative outcomes for open or minimally invasive approach.J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Dec;29(12):1688-93. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1688. Epub 2014 Nov 21. J Korean Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25469071 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4015-7. Epub 2014 Dec 6. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25480627
References
-
- Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg. 2007;73:773–8. - PubMed
-
- Peschaud F, Alves A, Berdah S, Kianmanesh R, Lurent C, Ma Brut JY, Mariette C, Meurette G, Pirro N, Veryrie N, Slim K. Indicazioni alla laparoscopia in chirurgia generale e digestiva. J Chir. 2006;6:65–79.
-
- Mouret P. L'adesiolisi coelioscopia. In: Testas P, Delaitre B, editor. Chirurgia digestiva per via coelioscopica. Edizioni Vigot, Friburgo; 1994. pp. 53–69.
-
- Watteville JC, Testas P. La coelioscopia nelle urgenze digestive. In: Testas P, Delaitre B, editor. Chirurgia digestiva per via coelioscopica. Edizioni Vigot, Friburgo; 1994. pp. 199–16.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources