Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
- PMID: 19153129
- PMCID: PMC2769030
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a3152
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
Abstract
In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement, as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarises the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE, and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also briefly describes the guideline development process; considers the limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; describes ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and discusses plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(suppl 1):21-34. - PubMed
-
- Batalden P, Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement: the devil is in the details [Editorial]. JAMA 2007;298:1059-61. - PubMed
-
- Kolb DA. Experiential learning. experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources