Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Jan 20;180(2):175-82.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081491.

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

Sasha Shepperd et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Avoidance of admission through provision of hospital care at home is a scheme whereby health care professionals provide active treatment in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require inpatient treatment in an acute care hospital. We sought to compare the effectiveness of this method of caring for patients with that type of in-hospital care.

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EconLit databases and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group register from the earliest date in each database until January 2008. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated a service providing an alternative to admission to an acute care hospital. We excluded trials in which the program did not offer a substitute for inpatient care. We performed meta-analyses for trials for which the study populations had similar characteristics and for which common outcomes had been measured.

Results: We included 10 randomized trials (with a total of 1327 patients) in our systematic review. Seven of these trials (with a total of 969 patients) were deemed eligible for meta-analysis of individual patient data, but we were able to obtain data for only 5 of these trials (with a total of 844 patients [87%]). There was no significant difference in mortality at 3 months for patients who received hospital care at home (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.09, p = 0.15). However, at 6 months, mortality was significantly lower for these patients (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, p = 0.005). Admissions to hospital were greater, but not significantly so, for patients receiving hospital care at home (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.96-2.33, p = 0.08). Patients receiving hospital care at home reported greater satisfaction than those receiving inpatient care. These programs were less expensive than admission to an acute care hospital ward when the analysis was restricted to treatment actually received and when the costs of informal care were excluded.

Interpretation: For selected patients, avoiding admission through provision of hospital care at home yielded similar outcomes to inpatient care, at a similar or lower cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM) flow chart showing the number of studies screened and included in the meta-analysis for avoiding admission through a hospital-at-home program. *The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of other interventions also included 1 unpublished trial by Dey, Woodman and the Manchester FASTER Trial Group.
None
Figure 2: Fixed-effects meta-analysis of individual patient data: mortality at 3 months. *Adjusted for age and sex. The N values represent the numbers of participants for which the trialists provided follow-up data (at our request); in some cases these values were less than the numbers of participants initially recruited (as stated in Appendix 2, available at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/180/2/175/DC2). Note: CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio.
None
Figure 3: Fixed-effects meta-analysis of individual patient data: mortality at 6 months. Adjusted for age and sex. The N values represent the numbers of participants for which the trialists provided follow-up data (at our request); in some cases these values were less than the numbers of participants initially recruited (as stated in Appendix 2, available at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/180/2/175/DC2). Note: CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio.
None
Figure 4: Fixed-effects meta-analysis of individual patient data: transfers to hospital at 3 months. *Adjusted for age and sex. The N values represent the numbers of participants for which the trialists provided follow-up data (at our request); in some cases these values were less than the numbers of participants initially recruited (as stated in Appendix 2, available at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/180/2/175/DC2). Note: CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio.

Comment in

References

    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:145-51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shepperd S, Doll H, Angus RM, et al. Admission avoidance hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(4):CD007491. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker G, Bhakta P, Lovett CA, et al. A systematic review of the costs and effectiveness of different models of paediatric home care. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:iii-108. - PubMed
    1. Shepperd S, Doll H, Gowers S, et al. Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD006410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfe CDA, Tilling K, Rudd AG. The effectiveness of community based rehabilitation for stroke patients who remain at home: a pilot randomised trial. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:563-9. - PubMed