Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan 20:9:2.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-2.

Systematic review of effect of community-level interventions to reduce maternal mortality

Elaine Kidney  1 , Heather R Winter, Khalid S Khan, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Catherine A Meads, Jonathan J Deeks, Christine Macarthur
Affiliations

Systematic review of effect of community-level interventions to reduce maternal mortality

Elaine Kidney et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The objective was to provide a systematic review of the effectiveness of community-level interventions to reduce maternal mortality.

Methods: We searched published papers using Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, CINAHL, BNI, CAB ABSTRACTS, IBSS, Web of Science, LILACS and African Index Medicus from inception or at least 1982 to June 2006; searched unpublished works using National Research Register website, metaRegister and the WHO International Trial Registry portal. We hand searched major references.Selection criteria were maternity or childbearing age women, comparative study designs with concurrent controls, community-level interventions and maternal death as an outcome. We carried out study selection, data abstraction and quality assessment independently in duplicate.

Results: We found five cluster randomised controlled trials (RCT) and eight cohort studies of community-level interventions. We summarised results as odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI), combined using the Peto method for meta-analysis. Two high quality cluster RCTs, aimed at improving perinatal care practices, showed a reduction in maternal mortality reaching statistical significance (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.98). Three equivalence RCTs of minimal goal-oriented versus usual antenatal care showed no difference in maternal mortality (1.09, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.25). The cohort studies were of low quality and did not contribute further evidence.

Conclusion: Community-level interventions of improved perinatal care practices can bring about a reduction in maternal mortality. This challenges the view that investment in such interventions is not worthwhile. Programmes to improve maternal mortality should be evaluated using randomised controlled techniques to generate further evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of improved perinatal care and minimal goal-oriented antenatal care models on maternal mortality.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. AbouZahr C. Maternal mortality in 2000: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Starrs AM. Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting. Lancet. 2006;368:1130–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69385-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO . The World Health Report 2005 – make every mother and child count. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2005. - PubMed
    1. Graham WJ, Filippi VA, Ronsmans C. Demonstrating programme impact on maternal mortality. Health Policy Plan. 1996;11:16–20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.16. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ, on behalf of The Lancet steering group Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types