Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 15;407(7):2216-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.033. Epub 2009 Jan 19.

Soil metal concentrations and toxicity: associations with distances to industrial facilities and implications for human health

Affiliations

Soil metal concentrations and toxicity: associations with distances to industrial facilities and implications for human health

C Marjorie Aelion et al. Sci Total Environ. .

Abstract

Urban and rural areas may have different levels of environmental contamination and different potential sources of exposure. Many metals, i.e., arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg), have well-documented negative neurological effects, and the developing fetus and young children are particularly at risk. Using a database of mother and child pairs, three areas were identified: a rural area with no increased prevalence of mental retardation and developmental delay (MR/DD) (Area A), and a rural area (Area B) and an urban area (Area C) with significantly higher prevalence of MR/DD in children as compared to the state-wide average. Areas were mapped and surface soil samples were collected from nodes of a uniform grid. Samples were analyzed for As, barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), Pb, manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and Hg concentrations and for soil toxicity, and correlated to identify potential common sources. ArcGIS was used to determine distances between sample locations and industrial facilities, which were correlated with both metal concentrations and soil toxicity. Results indicated that all metal concentrations (except Be and Hg) in Area C were significantly greater than those in Areas A and B (p< or =0.0001) and that Area C had fewer correlations between metals suggesting more varied sources of metals than in rural areas. Area C also had a large number of facilities whose distances were significantly correlated with metals, particularly Cr (maximum r=0.33; p=0.0002), and with soil toxicity (maximum r=0.25; p=0.007) over a large spatial scale. Arsenic was not associated with distance to any facility and may have a different anthropogenic, or natural source. In contrast to Area C, both rural areas had lower concentrations of metals, lower soil toxicity, and a small number of facilities with significant associations between distance and soil metals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of significant correlations for metal concentrations and Microtox® Soil Toxicity (MST) values (by metal or MST) for Areas A, B and C. Nine metals were correlated in Area A, and 8 metals (no Be was measured) and MST values in Areas B and C.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Locations of facilities (+) and soil samples (●) in Area C identifying approximate areas over which distance to facility and metal concentrations and Microtox® Soil Toxicity (MST) were correlated (p ≤ 0.05) as determined using ArcGIS® and SAS. All metals are labeled next to or within boxes corresponding to facilities with distances significantly correlated to concentrations of that metal (Mn not shown). Multiple facilities at one location are represented by multiple +s so that ‡ represents two and ‡‡ represents four facilities in close proximity. Facilities not included within boxes were not significantly correlated by distance to any metal or MST value.

References

    1. Abernathy CO, Liu YP, Longfellow D, Aposhian HV, Beck B, Fowler B, Goyer R, Menzer R, Rossman T, Thompson C, Waalkes M. Arsenic: health effects, mechanisms of action, and research issues. Environ Health Persp. 1999;107:593–597. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aelion CM, Davis HT. Use of a general toxicity test to predict heavy metal concentrations in residential soils. Chemosphere. 2007;67:1043–1049. - PubMed
    1. Aelion CM, Davis HT, McDermott S, Lawson AB. Metal concentrations in rural topsoil in South Carolina: Potential for human health impact. Sci Total Environ. 2008;402:149–156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ATSDR. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2008. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ - PubMed
    1. Calderón J, Ortiz-Pérez D, Yáñez L, Díaz-Barriga F. Human exposure to metals. Pathways of exposure, biomarkers of effect, and host factors. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2003;56:93–103. - PubMed

Publication types