Surface resorption following two forms of rapid maxillary expansion

Abstract

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a useful orthodontic technique for correction of posterior cross-bite of skeletal origin. The aim of the present study was to compare the frequency and nature of root resorption in premolars subjected to RME by means of either a tissue-borne, fixed split acrylic (Haas) palatal expansion applicance, or an all-wire framework appliance. Another factor examined was the relationship between the pattern of resorption and the duration of the retention period. RME was performed on five patients using the fixed split acrylic appliance and on four patients with the all-wire framework appliance. Following the transverse expansion, two upper and two lower premolars were extracted and processed for histological examination. Root resorption was found mainly on the buccal surfaces of all maxillary premolars. The resorption lacunae covered more of the root surface in premolars treated with an all-wire framework appliance compared to premolars treated with the acrylic expansion plate. The largest resorption areas were found on teeth extracted shortly after the expansion period and the smallest on premolars retained for a relatively longer period. Mandibular premolars showed neither buccal nor lingual resorptions. It was concluded that maximum anchorage of the expansion device, using the tissue-borne acrylic appliance, seems preferable in order to minimize the incidence of buccal surface root resorption. A longer post-treatment observation time is needed in order to draw more specific conclusions regarding the healing process of the damaged root surface.