Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study
- PMID: 1915618
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/13.4.293
Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the bond strengths to enamel obtained in shear/peel and tensile/peel modes of testing using five different ceramic brackets and two different light-cured composites. The site of failure was also examined. Shear/peel bond strength was significantly affected by adhesive type, with Heliosit having higher mean bond strengths than Prismafil. Bond strength was significantly affected by bracket type; the highest mean bond strength in both tests being attained using Transcend with Heliosit. All brackets resisted shear/peel forces better than tensile/peel forces. High bond strengths are associated with an increased incidence of bracket and enamel fractures with Transcend and Starfire.
Similar articles
-
A comparison between the old Transcend and the new Transcend series 2000 bracket.Br J Orthod. 1992 May;19(2):109-16. doi: 10.1179/bjo.19.2.109. Br J Orthod. 1992. PMID: 1627521
-
An evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: a preliminary laboratory and clinical report.Br J Orthod. 1991 Aug;18(3):203-9. doi: 10.1179/bjo.18.3.203. Br J Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1931854
-
Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Sep;106(3):290-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70049-4. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994. PMID: 8074094
-
Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jul;112(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70271-3. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997. PMID: 9228839 Review.
-
The best method of reconditioning ceramic brackets to get an optimum shear bond strength compared with new ceramic brackets - Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.Int Orthod. 2023 Sep;21(3):100788. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100788. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Int Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37441882
Cited by
-
Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 May 6;2021:5561040. doi: 10.1155/2021/5561040. eCollection 2021. ScientificWorldJournal. 2021. PMID: 34035672 Free PMC article.
-
New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.Prog Orthod. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00400-z. Prog Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35187595 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of torque expression in esthetic brackets.J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Sep 1;11(9):e783-e789. doi: 10.4317/jced.56102. eCollection 2019 Sep. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019. PMID: 31636869 Free PMC article.
-
Use of optical coherence tomography in orthodontics.Exp Ther Med. 2021 Dec;22(6):1424. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10859. Epub 2021 Oct 11. Exp Ther Med. 2021. PMID: 34707705 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Er:YAG Laser and Sandblasting in Recycling of Ceramic Brackets.J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Winter;8(1):17-21. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.04. Epub 2017 Jan 8. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28912939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources