Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union system of assessing medical experiments
- PMID: 19156538
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9113-x
Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union system of assessing medical experiments
Abstract
The Polish equivalents of Research Ethics Committees are Bioethics Committees (BCs). A questionnaire study has been undertaken to determine their situation. The BC is usually comprised of 13 members. Nine of these are doctors and four are non-doctors. In 2006 BCs assessed an average of 27.3 +/- 31.7 (range: 0-131) projects of clinical trials and 71.1 +/- 139.8 (range: 0-638) projects of other types of medical research. During one BC meeting an average of 10.3 +/- 14.7 (range: 0-71) projects of medical research were assessed (2006). The amendment of Polish laws according with Directive 2001/20/EC caused a percentage increase in BCs which assessed less than 20 projects per year (16% vs. 33% or 42% in 2003 vs. 2005 or 2006 respectively, p < 0,05). The results confirm the usefulness of the current practice of creating BCs by medical universities, medical institutes and regional chambers of physicians and dentists but rationalization of the workload for individual BCs is necessary.
Similar articles
-
[The role of bioethics committees in the systems protecting scientific biomedical research participants in France and in Poland].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Aug;35(206):119-22. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013. PMID: 24052993 Review. Polish.
-
[Research ethics committees: one size fits all?].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2012 Jan;32(187):41-5. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2012. PMID: 22400179 Polish.
-
[The system of protection of scientific biomedical research participants in France and in Poland].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Jul;35(205):55-8. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013. PMID: 23984608 Review. Polish.
-
Harmonisation of ethics committees' practice in 10 European countries.J Med Ethics. 2009 Nov;35(11):696-700. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030551. J Med Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19880708
-
WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Ethics approval for a research study (1).Early Hum Dev. 2018 Sep;124:46-48. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Early Hum Dev. 2018. PMID: 29880303
Cited by
-
Research Ethics in the Context of Transition: Gaps in Policies and Programs on the Protection of Research Participants in the Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1689-1706. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9723-4. Epub 2015 Nov 9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26548313 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 29;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00826-4. BMC Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 36038889 Free PMC article.
-
Failures in clinical trials in the European Union: lessons from the Polish experience.Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1087-98. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9400-9. Epub 2012 Oct 6. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23054675 Free PMC article.
-
Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Apr;9(2):3-11. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.3. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014. PMID: 24782068 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources