Insights into the biology of mobilized hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells through innovative treatment schedules of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100
- PMID: 19157683
- PMCID: PMC2669109
- DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.10.017
Insights into the biology of mobilized hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells through innovative treatment schedules of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100
Abstract
Objective: The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 mobilizes hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) in several species. Few data are available on the biology of HSPC mobilized with AMD3100 as single agent. To further study the kinetics and properties of AMD3100-mobilized HSPC, and to explore the size of mobilizable pools of HSPC targeted by AMD3100, we studied the effect of a continuous infusion scheme with saturating doses of AMD3100 [AMDi].
Materials and methods: Using established procedures, we evaluated mice mobilized with AMD3100, or those transplanted with AMD3100-mobilized HSPC.
Results: Relative to single-bolus AMD3100 [AMDb], the number of circulating CFU-C or CRU was dramatically higher after [AMDi]. During [AMDi], circulating CFU-C accumulated slowly, but after its discontinuation, CFU-C disappeared rapidly. Compared to bone marrow (BM)-c-kit(+) cells, AMD3100-mobilized (AMDb or AMDi) c-kit(+) cells showed reduced expression of several cytoadhesion molecules, similar to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized c-kit(+) cells. In contrast to the latter, expression of CXCR4 and CD26 were not reduced on AMD3100-mobilized c-kit(+) cells. BM homing of [AMDi]-mobilized CFU-C was >50% increased over normal BM-CFU-C. Hematopoietic recovery after transplantation of [AMDi]-mobilized peripheral blood was comparable to that of continuous infusion granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood. AMD3100-mobilized HSPC were predominantly in G(0), and partial bromodeoxyuridine-labeling experiments documented underrepresentation of labeled cells (<5%) among [AMDb]-mobilized c-kit(+) cells, suggesting that cycling cells in BM, or those that recently completed cell cycle, are not targeted for mobilization by AMD3100.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that [AMDi] is an efficacious mobilization scheme fully supporting transplantation demands and expands previous knowledge about properties and size of AMD3100-sensitive BM-HSPC pools.
Figures





References
-
- Schmitz N, Linch DC, Dreger P, et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients. Lancet. 1996;347:353–357. - PubMed
-
- Switzer GE, Goycoolea JM, Dew MA, Graeff EC, Hegland J. Donating stimulated peripheral blood stem cells vs bone marrow: do donors experience the procedures differently? Bone marrow transplantation. 2001;27:917–923. - PubMed
-
- Carlo-Stella C, Cesana C, Regazzi E, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors receiving recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Experimental Hematology. 2000;28:216–224. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases