Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;47(3):774-6.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02374-08. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

Performance of microcalorimetry for early detection of methicillin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

Performance of microcalorimetry for early detection of methicillin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Daniela Baldoni et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

We describe a calorimetric assay for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) within 5 h. Microbial heat was calculated in culture with and without cefoxitin. Among 30 genetically distinct clinical isolates, 19/20 MRSA (95%) and 10/10 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (100%) were correctly identified. Microcalorimetry may be useful for rapid MRSA screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Heat-flow (A) and total heat (B) of both reference MSSA ATCC 29213 and MRSA COL strains cultured in the presence of cefoxitin at 4 μg/ml (solid lines) or without antibiotic (dashed lines).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Relative heat distribution in 20 repeated measurements of the reference strains MSSA ATCC 29213 and MRSA COL (A); and 30 clinical isolates, 10 different MSSA and 20 different MRSA strains (B). Relative heat is calculated as the ratio between the total heat in the presence and absence of 4 μg/ml cefoxitin after 3 h, 4 h, and 5 h of incubation. Open circles indicate MSSA and closed circles MRSA; the horizontal line indicates the cutoff value of relative heat (0.4) used for the discrimination of MSSA and MRSA.

References

    1. Amsterdam, D. 2005. Susceptibility testing of antimicrobials in liquid media, p. 61-143. In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 5th ed. LWW Press, Philadelphia, PA.
    1. Brown, D. F., D. I. Edwards, P. M. Hawkey, D. Morrison, G. L. Ridgway, K. J. Towner, and M. W. Wren. 2005. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 561000-1018. - PubMed
    1. Fang, H., and G. Hedin. 2006. Use of cefoxitin-based selective broth for improved detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44592-594. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Felten, A., B. Grandry, P. H. Lagrange, and I. Casin. 2002. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 402766-2771. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mackenzie, A. M., H. Richardson, R. Lannigan, and D. Wood. 1995. Evidence that the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards disk test is less sensitive than the screen plate for detection of low-expression-class methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 331909-1911. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms