An emergency clinical pathway for stroke patients--results of a cluster randomised trial (isrctn41456865)
- PMID: 19159477
- PMCID: PMC2640375
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-14
An emergency clinical pathway for stroke patients--results of a cluster randomised trial (isrctn41456865)
Abstract
Background: Emergency Clinical Pathways (ECP) for stroke have never been tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an ECP for stroke patients in Latium (Italy) emergency system.
Methods: cluster-RCT designed to compare stroke patient referrals by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and Emergency Room (ER) health professionals trained in the ECP, with those of non-trained EMS and ER controls. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible (aged </= 80 and symptom onset </= 6 hours) stroke patients referred to a stroke unit (SU). Intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed, and risk ratios (RR) adjusted by age, gender and area, were calculated.
Results: 2656 patients in the intervention arm and 2239 in the control arm required assistance; 78.3% of the former and 80.6% of the latter were admitted to hospitals, and respectively 74.8% and 78.3% were confirmed strokes. Of the eligible confirmed strokes, 106/434 (24.4%) in the intervention arm and 43/328 (13.1%) in the control arm were referred to the SU in the ITT analysis (RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 0.79-4.00), and respectively 105/243 (43.2%) and 43/311 (13.8%) in the PP analysis (RR = 3.21; 95%CI: 1.62-4.98). Of patients suitable for i.v. thrombolysis, 15/175 (8.6%) in the intervention arm and 2/115 (1.7%) in the control arm received thrombolysis (p = 0.02) in the ITT analysis, and respectively 15/99 (15.1%) and 2/107 (1.9%)(p = 0.001) in the PP analysis.
Conclusion: Our data suggest potenti efficiency and feasibility of an ECP. The integration of EMS and ERs with SU networks for organised acute stroke care is feasible and may ameliorate the quality of care for stroke patients.
Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN41456865).
Figures
References
-
- Alberts MJ, Hademenos G, Latchaw RE, Jagoda A, Marler JR, Mayberg MR, Starke RD, Todd HW, Viste KM, Girgus M, Shephard T, Emr M, Shwayder P, Walker MD for the Brian Attack Coalition Recommendations for the Establishment of Primary Stroke Centers. JAMA. 2000;283:3102–3109. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.23.3102. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration . The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke (Cochrane Review)
-
- Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL. Identifying Stroke in the Field: Prospective Validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) Stroke. 2000;31:71–76. - PubMed
-
- Reeves MJ, Arora S, Broderick JP, Frankel M, Heinrich JP, Hickenbottom S, Karp H, LaBresh KA, Malarcher A, Mensah G, Moomaw CJ, Schwamm L, Weiss P, Paul Coverdell Prototype Registries Writing Group Acute stroke care in the US: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2005;36:1232–1240. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000165902.18021.5b. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
