Sensitivity and specificity of oral brush biopsy
- PMID: 19160103
- DOI: 10.1080/07357900802266515
Sensitivity and specificity of oral brush biopsy
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantage of computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy compared with synchronous scalpel biopsy in the early detection of oral lesions. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, brush and scalpel biopsies were performed on 75 patients. Six patients had to be excluded due to inadequate results, and 43 were shown to have dysplastic epithelium, 15 carcinoma, and 11 suspicious lesions. Therefore, the sensitivity for the detection of abnormal cells by means of OralCDx was 52%, specificity 29%, and the positive predictive value 63%. According to our results, the use of oral brush biopsy as a standardized, minimally invasive method of screening oral lesions should be reconsidered.
Comment in
-
A response to "sensitivity and specificity of oral brush biopsy" by Hohlweg-Majert et al.Cancer Invest. 2010 Jun;28(5):560-1. doi: 10.3109/07357900903095763. Cancer Invest. 2010. PMID: 20450337 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Aug;106(2):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.030. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. PMID: 18644521
-
Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.Gen Dent. 2002 Nov-Dec;50(6):500-3. Gen Dent. 2002. PMID: 12572180
-
Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1036-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24089. Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19165806
-
Analysis of new diagnostic methods in suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 May 1;14(5):E210-6. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009. PMID: 19218907 Review.
-
[Usefulness of oral exfoliative cytology for the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma].Minerva Stomatol. 2004 Mar;53(3):77-86. Minerva Stomatol. 2004. PMID: 15107778 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Adjunctive Techniques and Diagnostic Aids in the Early Detection of Oral Premalignant Disorders and Cancer: An Update for the General Dental Practitioners.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S28-S33. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_635_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022. PMID: 36110790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Techniques for precancerous lesion diagnosis.J Oncol. 2011;2011:326094. doi: 10.1155/2011/326094. Epub 2011 Jan 13. J Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21318165 Free PMC article.
-
Transepithelial Brush Biopsy - Oral CDx® - A Noninvasive Method for the Early Detection of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions.J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):222-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7659.4065. Epub 2014 Feb 3. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014. PMID: 24701540 Free PMC article.
-
Different CO2 laser vaporization protocols for the therapy of oral precancerous lesions and precancerous conditions: a 10-year follow-up.Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0910-5. Epub 2011 Mar 31. Lasers Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 21452010 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.Head Neck Oncol. 2011 Aug 24;3:39. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-39. Head Neck Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21864339 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical