Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD007136.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007136.pub2.

The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries

Tracey Perez Koehlmoos  1 , Rukhsana Gazi, S Shahed Hossain, K Zaman
Affiliations

The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries

Tracey Perez Koehlmoos et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Social franchising has developed as a possible means of improving provision of health services through engaging the non-state sector in low- and middle-income countries.

Objectives: To examine the evidence that social franchising has on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register (up to October 2007), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 3), MEDLINE, Ovid (1950 to September Week 3 2007), EMBASE, Ovid (1980 to 2007 Week 38), CINAHL, Ovid (1982 to September Week 3 2007), EconLit, WebSPIRS (1969 to Sept 2007), LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index (1975 to March 2008), Sociological Abstracts, CSA Illumnia (1952 September 2007), WHOLIS (1948 November 2007).

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series comparing social franchising models with other models of health service delivery, other social franchising models or absence of health services.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently applied the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies to scan titles and abstracts. The same two review authors independently screened full reports of selected citations . At each stage, results were compared and discrepancies settled through discussion.

Main results: No studies were found which were eligible for inclusion in this review.

Authors' conclusions: There is a need to develop rigorous studies to evaluate the effects of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries. Such studies should be informed by the wider literature to identify models of social franchising that have a sound theoretical basis and empirical research addressing their reach, acceptability, feasibility, maintenance and measurability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Update of

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Agha 2007 {published data only}
    1. Agha S, Gage A, Balal A. Changes of perceptions of quality of, and access to, services among clients of a franctional franchise network in Nepal. Journal BioSocial Science 2007;39:341‐54. - PubMed
LaVake 2003 {published data only}
    1. LaVake S. Applying social franchising techniques to youth reproductive health/HIV services. Youth Issues paper 2. Arlington, VA: Family Health International 2003.
Lonnroth 2007 {published data only}
    1. Lonnroth K, Aung T, Maung W, Kluge H, Uplekar M. Social franchising of TB through GBs in Myanmar: an assessment of treatment results, access, equity and financial protection. Heatlh Policy and Planning 2007;22:156‐66. - PubMed
McBride 2001 {published data only}
    1. McBride J, Ahmed R. Social franchising as a strategy for expanding access to reproductive health services: a case study of the Green Star service delivery network in Pakistan. Commercial Marketing Strategies Technical Paper, Washington, DC: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 2001.
Montagu 2002 {published data only}
    1. Montagu D. Franchising of health services in developing countries. Health Policy and Planning 2002;17(2):121‐30. - PubMed
Prata 2005 {published data only}
    1. Prata N, Montagu D, Jeffreys E. Private sector, human resources and health franchising in Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005;83(4):274‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Ruster 2003 {published data only}
    1. Ruster J. Franchising in health: emerging models, experiences, and challenges in primary care. Public Policy for the Private Sector Note No. 263. The World Bank Group Private Sector and Infrastructure Network, 2003.
Smith 2002 {published data only}
    1. Smith E. Social franchising reproductive health services: can it work?. Working Paper No. 5, Marie Stoppes International, 2002.
Stephenson 2004 {published data only}
    1. Stephenson R, Tsui A, Sulzbach S, Bardsley P, Bekele G, Giday T, et al. Franchising reproductive health services. Health Services Research 2004;39(6 Pt 2):2053‐80. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Aaserud 2006
    1. Aaserud M, Dahlgren AT, Sturm H, Kosters JP, Hill S, Furbert CD, et al. Pharmaceutical policies: effects on rational drug use, an overview of 13 reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004397.pub2] - DOI
Bennet 2005
    1. Bennet S, Hanson K, Kadama P, Montagu D. Working with the non‐state sector to achieve public health goals. Making Health Systems Work: Working Paper No. 2 2005.
Bustreo 2003
    1. Bustreo F, Hardin A, Axelson H. Can developing countries achieve adequate improvements in child health outcomes without engaging the private sector?. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(12):886‐94. - PMC - PubMed
Hawe 1990
    1. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J. Evaluating health promotion: a health workers guide. MacLennan and Petty, Sydney 1990.
Huntington 2007
    1. Huntington, D. Personal communication 27 May 2007.
Jackson 2005
    1. Jackson N, Waters E. Guidelines for Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Version 1.2. Deakin University: Australia April 2005. See http://ph.cochrane.org/Files/Website%20Documents/GuidelinesforHPPHreview....
Jefferys 2004
    1. Jefferys E. Evaluating the private sector potential for franchising TB and HIV/AIDS diagnosis and care in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Overview Report. Institute for Health Sector Development 2004.
Ladipo 1990
    1. Ladipo O, McNamara R, Delano G, Weiss E, Otolorin E. Family planning in traditional markets in Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning 1990;21:311‐21. - PubMed
Liu 2004
    1. Liu X, Hotchkiss D, Bose S, Bitran R, Giedion U. Contracting for primary health services: evidence on its effects and framework for evaluation. Bethesda, MD: The Partners for Health Reformplus Project, Abt Associates Inc, 2004.
Makinen 1997
    1. Makinen M, Leighton C. Summary of market analysis for a franchise network of primary health care in Lusaka, Zambia. Technical Report 15. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc, 1997.
Mills 2002
    1. Mills A, Brugha R, Hanson K, McPake B. What can be done about the private health sector in low‐income countries?. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2002;80(4):325‐30. - PMC - PubMed
Moran 2004
    1. Moran D, Batley R. Literature review of non‐state sector provision of basic services. DfID, 2004.
Perrot 2006
    1. Perrot J. Different approaches to contracting in health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006;84(11):859‐866. - PMC - PubMed
Peters 2004
    1. Peters D, Mirchandani G, Hansen P. Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they?. Health Policy and Planning 2004;19(suppl 1):i5‐i21. - PubMed
Pillaye 2003
    1. Pillaye J, Clarke A. An evaluation of completeness of tuberculosis notification in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health 2003;3:31. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-31] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Thomas 2006 [Computer program]
    1. Thomas J, Brunton J. EPPI‐Reviewer 3.0: analysis and management of data for research synthesis. London: Social Sciences Research Unit, Institute of Education, 2006.
UN 2005
    1. UN Millennium Project. Preparing national strategies to achieve the Millennium Development Goals: A Handbook. http://www.undp.org/poverty/docs/mdg‐support/handbook/handbook111605_wit... 2006.
USAID PSP‐One 2006
    1. USAID, PSP‐One. Private provider networks: the role of viability in expanding the supply of reproductive health and family planning services, Technical Report No. 3. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc, 2006.
USAID‐India 2006
    1. USAID‐India. International workshop on social franchising in the health sector. Workshop proceedings. 2006.
Waters 2003
    1. Waters H, Hatt L, Peters D. Working with the private sector for child health. Health Policy and Planning 2003;18:127‐37. - PubMed
WHO and USAID 2007
    1. WHO, USAID. Public policy and franchising reproductive health: current evidence and future directions. Guidance from a technical consultation meeting (unpublished) 2007.
Working with the non‐state sector 2006
    1. Working with the Non‐State Sector to Achieve Public Health Goals: Consultation on Priorities and Actions. Chateau de Penthes, Pregny, Geneva 20‐21 February 2006 [http://www.who.int/management/background.pdf].
World Bank 2007
    1. World Bank. "Country Groups", Data and Statistics. The World Bank 2007. [Accessed on‐line: http://go.worldbank.org/D7SN0B8YU0]

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources