TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay--pilot study
- PMID: 19163986
- DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650483
TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay--pilot study
Abstract
Within the area of telerobotic surgery no standardized means of surgically relevant performance evaluation has been established. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program provides a set of standardized tasks that are considered the 'gold standard' in surgical skill assessment. We present a methodology for using one of the SAGES FLS tasks for surgical robotic performance evaluation. The TeleRobotic FLS methodology is extendable to two other FLS tasks. Time delay in teleoperation in general and telesurgery in particular is one of the fundamental effects that limits performance in telerobotic surgery. In this pilot study the effect of time delay on the Block Transfer task performance was investigated. The RAVEN Surgical Robot was used in a master/slave configuration in which time delays of 0, 250, 500, and 1000 ms were introduced by a network emulator between the master (Surgeon Site) and the slave (Patient Site). The study included three subjects, each of whom was presented with three of the four conditions. The results show that one subject had a lower error rate with increasing time delay, whereas the other subjects had a higher error rate with increased delay. The subject with the longest average completion time suffered the least performance decrease under time delay.
Similar articles
-
Objective assessment of telesurgical robot systems: Telerobotic FLS.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:263-5. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008. PMID: 18391301
-
Teleoperation in surgical robotics--network latency effects on surgical performance.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6860-3. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333120. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009. PMID: 19964184
-
Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments.Int J Med Robot. 2006 Sep;2(3):216-24. doi: 10.1002/rcs.99. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520635
-
Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1389-402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7. Epub 2002 Jul 29. Surg Endosc. 2002. PMID: 12140630 Review.
-
[Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery].Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2003 Jan-Mar;23(1):58-66. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2003. PMID: 12768216 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):240. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01984-w. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38833111 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing.Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1192-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1343-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20872021
-
International survey study of attitudes towards robotic surgery.J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):231-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0301-8. Epub 2011 Aug 6. J Robot Surg. 2012. PMID: 27638277
-
Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery.Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):681-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1243-3. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20652320 Review.
-
Virtual Interactive Presence in Global Surgical Education: International Collaboration Through Augmented Reality.World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.053. Epub 2015 Sep 3. World Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26342783 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical