Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer
- PMID: 19164211
- PMCID: PMC2668636
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5223
Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer
Abstract
Purpose: There is an increasing demand for researchers to provide research results to participants. Our aim was to define an appropriate process for this, based on needs and attitudes of participants.
Methods: A multicenter survey in five sites in the United States and Canada was offered to parents of children with cancer and adolescents with cancer. Respondents indicated their preferred mode of communication of research results with respect to implications; timing, provider, and content of the results; reasons for and against providing results; and barriers to providing results.
Results: Four hundred nine parents (including 19 of deceased children) and 86 adolescents responded. Most parents (n = 385; 94.2%) felt that they had a strong right to research results. For positive results, most wanted a letter or e-mail summary (n = 238; 58.2%) or a phone call followed by a letter (n = 100; 24.4%). If the results were negative, phone call (n = 136; 33.3%) or personal visits (n = 150; 36.7%) were preferred. Parents wanted the summary to include long-term sequelae and suggestions for participants (n = 341; 83.4%), effect on future treatments (n = 341; 83.4%), and subsequent research steps (n = 284; 69.5%). Understanding the researcher was a main concern about receiving results (n = 145; 35.5%). Parents felt that results provide information to support quality of life (n = 315; 77%) and raise public awareness of research (n = 282; 68.9%). Adolescents identified similar preferences.
Conclusion: Parents of children with cancer and adolescents with cancer feel strongly that they have a right to be offered research results and have specific preferences of how and what information should be communicated.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
Sharing study results with trial participants: time for action.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):838-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0865. Epub 2009 Jan 21. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19164202 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Apr;48(4):441-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20766. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007. PMID: 16425279
-
Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: A survey of cancer patients.Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):574-581. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665597. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Clin Trials. 2016. PMID: 27559022
-
Disclosure of medical error to parents and paediatric patients: assessment of parents' attitudes and influencing factors.Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):286-90. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.163097. Epub 2009 Nov 29. Arch Dis Child. 2010. PMID: 19948514
-
Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):558-64. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.183. Epub 2013 Jan 31. Genet Med. 2013. PMID: 23370450 Free PMC article.
-
Offering parents individualized feedback on the results of psychological testing conducted for research purposes with children: ethical issues and recommendations.J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007 Apr-Jun;36(2):242-52. doi: 10.1080/15374410701279636. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17484696 Review.
Cited by
-
Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey.Trials. 2010 Dec 1;11:116. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-116. Trials. 2010. PMID: 21122094 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding Ethical Issues of Research Participation From the Perspective of Participating Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jun;14(3):200-209. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12209. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28207982 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 18;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00767-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 35300680 Free PMC article.
-
Health Research Funding Agencies' Policies, Recommendations, and Tools for Dissemination.Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(4):473-482. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0072. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018. PMID: 30739901 Free PMC article.
-
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 30832733 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fernandez CV. The return of research results to participants: An ongoing debate modeled in cancer research. Harvard Health Policy Rev. 2007;8:16–28.
-
- Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Weijer C. Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative. IRB. 2003;25:12–19. - PubMed
-
- Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA. 2002;288:363–365. - PubMed
-
- Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, et al. The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:1170–1178. - PubMed
-
- Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. JAMA. 2005;294:737–740. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous