Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2230-5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812880106. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

FGF-dependent left-right asymmetry patterning in zebrafish is mediated by Ier2 and Fibp1

Affiliations

FGF-dependent left-right asymmetry patterning in zebrafish is mediated by Ier2 and Fibp1

Sung-Kook Hong et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Establishment of left-right asymmetry in vertebrates requires nodal, Wnt-PCP and FGF signaling and involves ciliogenesis in a laterality organ. Effector genes through which FGF signaling affects laterality have not been described. We isolated the zebrafish ier2 and fibp1 genes as FGF target genes and show that their protein products interact. Knock down of these factors interferes with establishment of organ laterality and causes defective cilia formation in Kupffer's Vesicle, the zebrafish laterality organ. Cilia are also lost after suppression of FGF8, but can be rescued by injection of ier2 and fibp1 mRNA. We conclude that Ier2 and Fibp1 mediate FGF signaling in ciliogenesis in Kupffer's Vesicle and in the establishment of laterality in the zebrafish embryo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Ier2 and Fibp1 are Downstream of FGF. (A–F) Whole-mount in situ hybridization with ier2 (A–C) at 80% epiboly, and with fibp1 (D–F) at 60% epiboly stages after injection of control gfp RNA, 100 pg (A and D); fgf8 RNA, 5 pg (B and E); and dnfgfr4 RNA, 300 pg (C and F). (G and H) Physical interaction between Ier2 and Fibp1. Immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (IB) are indicated. (I–L) Intracellular localization of Ier2 and Fibp1. Ier2 (I) and Fibp1 (J) are colocalized in the nucleus (K) after injection of epitope-tagged constructs into zebrafish embryos. (L) Merged image I–K
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Ier2 and Fibp1 are required for convergent extension. Control (A and B) and ier2 morphant (C and D). Lateral (A and C) and dorsal (B and D) views at the 5-somite stage. Brackets in A and C show the distance between head and tail, and arrowheads in B and D show the width of the somites. (E–L) Two-color in situ hybridization with marker genes at the 3-somite stage. Dorsal views of anterior (E–H) and posterior (I–L) region. (E and I) Drawings of a normal embryo indicating the patterns of the markers used, ctsl1b (red), dlx3b (blue), ntl (blue), and pcdh8 (red). (F and J) Control MO-injected embryo. (G and K) ier2 MO-injected embryo. (H and L) fibp1 MO-injected embryo. In the experimental embryos, notochord and somites are wider and extension along the A/P axis is reduced.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Functional interaction between Ier2 and Fibp1. (A–D) Lateral views at 24 hpf. The ier2 MO-injected embryo has a short trunk (B) compared with the control (A). The ier2 MO phenotype was rescued by coinjection with zebrafish ier2 mRNA (C) and human ier2 mRNA (D). (E–S). Lateral views at 48 hpf. (E–L) Knock down phenotypes. Low doses of ier2 MO (F) or fibp1 MO (H) have no phenotype, whereas effective doses of ier2 MO (G) and fibp1 MO (I) show very similar phenotypes. Coinjection with both MOs at low dose mimics the high-dose phenotype (J). ier2 MO is rescued by fibp1 RNA (K), and fibp1 MO is rescued by ier2 RNA (L). (M–S) Ier2 and fibp1 overexpression phenotypes. (M) Control RNA-injected embryos. (N and O) ier2 RNA injection phenotypes at low dose and effective dose. (P and Q) fibp1 RNA injection phenotypes at low dose and effective dose. (R) Coinjection of low dose of ier2 plus fibp1 RNA. (S) Injection of human hier2 RNA.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Ier2 and Fibp1 are required to establish left–right asymmetry in zebrafish. Control MO (A, E, I, and M), ier2 MO, 6.5 ng (B, F, J, and N), fibp1 MO, 7 ng (C, G, K, and O), and ier2 MO plus fibp1 MO, 2 plus 3 ng (D, H, L, and P) were injected, and embryos examined by whole-mount in situ hybridization. (Q) Quantification of experiments illustrated in A-L. (A–D) Dorsal view of spaw expression at 19 hpf. MO-injected embryos show bilateral expression (B–D) compared with left side expression of controls (A). (E–H) Ventral view of cmlc2 expression at 36 hpf. Ier2 and fibp1 MO cause abnormal heart laterality and looping (F–H); control in E. (I–L) Asymmetric expression of foxa3 in gut was altered by ier2 or fibp1 MO injection (J–L), compared with controls (I), all at 36 hpf. (M–P) Ier2 and fibp1 MOs caused notochord undulation at 22 hpf. h, heart; g, gut; n, notochord.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Cilia formation in Kupffer's vesicle depends on Ier2 and Fibp1. (A–F) Monocilia were detected with anti-acetylated tubulin antibody (red), and nuclei with DAPI (blue) in Kupffer's vesicle at the 5-somite stage. fgf8 MO, 8 ng (B) and ier2 MO plus fibp1 MO (E) -injected embryos show dramatic reduction of cilia, compared with control (A). Moderate reduction of cilia by ier2 MO (C) or fibp1 MO (D) alone was observed. Loss of cilia was rescued by coinjection with ier2 RNA plus fibp1 RNA with fgf8 MO (F). For levels of MOs see legend to Fig. 4. (G) Number of cilia in Kupffer's vesicle; 12 embryos were counted in each case corresponding to images in (A–F). n, notochord.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Involvement of Ier2 and Fibp1 in forerunner cell formation and in charon expression in Kupffer's vesicle. (A–H), embryos were fixed at the 5-somite stage. Expression patterns of fgf8 (A and D), ier2 (B–D), and cha (C) in normal embryos. Red arrowheads indicate Kupffer's vesicle. (A and B) In situ hybridization with purple staining. (C and D) Fluorescence in situ hybridization. (E–H) Charon expression depends on FGF signaling and Ier2/Fibp1 function. Embryos were hybridized with cha probe after injection of control MO (E), fgf8 MO (F), ier2 MO plus fibp1 MO (G), and fgf8 MO + ier2 RNA + fibp1 RNA (H). (I–L) Embryos at 80% epiboly hybridized with casanova (cas) probe, which highlights dorsal forerunner cells labels endoderm. An asterisk points to dorsal forerunner cells. The embryos were injected with the MO indicated. For levels of MOs see legends to Fig. 4 and 5. n, notochord.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bisgrove BW, Morelli SH, Yost HJ. Genetics of human laterality disorders: Insights from vertebrate model systems. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003;4:1–32. - PubMed
    1. Hamada H, Meno C, Watanabe D, Saijoh Y. Establishment of vertebrate left–right asymmetry. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:103–113. - PubMed
    1. Raya A, Belmonte JC. Left-right asymmetry in the vertebrate embryo: From early information to higher-level integration. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:283–293. - PubMed
    1. Capdevila J, et al. Mechanisms of left–right determination in vertebrates. Cell. 2000;101:9–21. - PubMed
    1. Speder P, Petzoldt A, Suzanne M, Noselli S. Strategies to establish left/right asymmetry in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:351–358. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms