Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009;27(1):17-25.
doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0455.

Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: coupled bilateral load training

James H Cauraugh  1 , Stephen A Coombes, Neha Lodha, Sagar K Naik, Jeffery J Summers
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: coupled bilateral load training

James H Cauraugh et al. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009.

Abstract

Background: The current treatment intervention study determined the effect of coupled bilateral training (i.e., bilateral movements and EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation) and resistive load (mass) on upper extremity motor recovery in chronic stroke.

Methods: Thirty chronic stroke subjects were randomly assigned to one of three behavioral treatment groups and completed 6 hours of rehabilitation in 4 days: (1) coupled bilateral training with a load on the unimpaired hand, (2) coupled bilateral training with no load on the unimpaired hand, and (3) control (no stimulation assistance or load).

Results: Separate mixed design ANOVAs revealed improved motor capabilities by the coupled bilateral groups. From the pretest to the posttest, both the coupled bilateral no load and load groups moved a higher number of blocks and demonstrated more regularity in the sustained contraction task. Faster motor reaction times across test sessions for the coupled bilateral load group provided additional evidence for improved motor capabilities.

Conclusions: Together these behavioral findings lend support to the contribution of coupled bilateral training with a load on the unimpaired arm to improved motor capabilities on the impaired arm. This evidence supports a neural explanation in that simultaneously moving both limbs during stroke rehabilitation training appears to activate balanced interhemispheric interactions while an extra load on the unimpaired limb provides stability to the system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Median and SE bars for the fractionated motor reaction times as a function of treatment group by test session.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Botwinick J, Thompson LW. Components of reaction time in relation to age and sex. J Genet Psychol. 1966a;108(2d Half):175–183. - PubMed
    1. Botwinick J, Thompson LW. Premotor and motor components of reaction time. J Exp Psychol. 1966b;71(1):9–15. - PubMed
    1. Carson RG. Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs. Brain Research Reviews. 2005;49(3):641–662. - PubMed
    1. Cauraugh JH. Coupled rehabilitation protocols and neural plasticity: upper extremity improvements in chronic hemiparesis. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(35):337–347. - PubMed
    1. Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1589–1594. - PubMed

Publication types