A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426
- PMID: 19165382
- PMCID: PMC2627860
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11447
A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426
Abstract
Objective: We conducted a review of the history and performance of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing in support of the finalization and implementation of Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DNT test guideline 426 (TG 426).
Information sources and analysis: In this review we summarize extensive scientific efforts that form the foundation for this testing paradigm, including basic neurotoxicology research, interlaboratory collaborative studies, expert workshops, and validation studies, and we address the relevance, applicability, and use of the DNT study in risk assessment.
Conclusions: The OECD DNT guideline represents the best available science for assessing the potential for DNT in human health risk assessment, and data generated with this protocol are relevant and reliable for the assessment of these end points. The test methods used have been subjected to an extensive history of international validation, peer review, and evaluation, which is contained in the public record. The reproducibility, reliability, and sensitivity of these methods have been demonstrated, using a wide variety of test substances, in accordance with OECD guidance on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard characterization. Multiple independent, expert scientific peer reviews affirm these conclusions.
Keywords: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; children’s health; developmental neurotoxicity; guideline; hazard assessment; risk assessment.
Similar articles
-
Recommendations for harmonization of data collection and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity endpoints in regulatory guideline studies: Proceedings of workshops presented at Society of Toxicology and joint Teratology Society and Neurobehavioral Teratology Society meetings.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017 Sep;63:24-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017. PMID: 28757310 Free PMC article.
-
The potential of mechanistic information organised within the AOP framework to increase regulatory uptake of the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery of assays.Reprod Toxicol. 2021 Aug;103:159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Reprod Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 34147625 Free PMC article.
-
International Regulatory and Scientific Effort for Improved Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing.Toxicol Sci. 2019 Jan 1;167(1):45-57. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy211. Toxicol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30476307
-
Developmental neurotoxicity guideline study: issues with methodology, evaluation and regulation.Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2012 Sep;52(3):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2012.00374.x. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2012. PMID: 22925212 Review.
-
Toward a Better Testing Paradigm for Developmental Neurotoxicity: OECD Efforts and Regulatory Considerations.Biology (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;10(2):86. doi: 10.3390/biology10020086. Biology (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33498772 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of environmental neurotoxic: current methods and usefulness of human stem cells.Heliyon. 2020 Dec 19;6(12):e05773. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05773. eCollection 2020 Dec. Heliyon. 2020. PMID: 33376823 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) a developmental neurotoxicant?Neurotoxicology. 2011 Jan;32(1):9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.12.010. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Neurotoxicology. 2011. PMID: 21182867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting In Vitro Neurotoxicity Induced by Nanoparticles Using Machine Learning.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 25;21(15):5280. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155280. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32722414 Free PMC article.
-
Disruption of paired-associate learning in rat offspring perinatally exposed to dioxins.Arch Toxicol. 2014 Mar;88(3):789-98. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1161-y. Epub 2013 Nov 29. Arch Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24292196 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP): Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development induces impairment of learning and memory abilities of children.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Sep 1;354:153-175. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29524501 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams J. Methods in behavioral teratology. In: Riley EP, Vorhees CV, editors. Handbook of Behavioral Teratology. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. pp. 67–97.
-
- Adams J, Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Nelson CJ, Miller DR. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: preliminary research. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985a;7:555–578. - PubMed
-
- Adams J, Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Nelson CJ, Reiter LW, Sobotka TJ, et al. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: protocol design and testing procedures. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985b;7:579–586. - PubMed
-
- Adams J, Oglesby DM, Ozemek HS, Rath J, Kimmel CA, Buelke-Sam J. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: programmed data entry and automated test systems. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985c;7:547–554. - PubMed
-
- Adams J, Vorhees CV, Middaugh LD. Developmental neurotoxicity of anticonvulsants: human and animal evidence on phenytoin. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990;12:203–214. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous