Pelvic exenteration for clinical T4 rectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 93 patients at a single institution over a 30-year period
- PMID: 19167974
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.014
Pelvic exenteration for clinical T4 rectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 93 patients at a single institution over a 30-year period
Abstract
Background: Patients with stage T4 rectal cancer are known to have poor survival and often require pelvic exenteration (PE). We describe the oncologic outcome of PE for patients with clinical T4 rectal cancer over a 30-year period.
Methods: Data for 93 patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent PE between 1975 and 2005 were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: Curative resection was performed in 91 patients (97.9%). Estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 52% and 46%, respectively. Irradiation was administered in 18 patients (19.4%). Local recurrence was observed in 7 patients, of whom 6 had lymph node (LN) involvement. Estimated local recurrence rate at 2 years was 8.6% (2.0% in node-negative and 16.4% in node-positive patients). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lateral pelvic LN involvement (P = .03), a carcinoembryonic antigen level of >10 ng/dL (P = .04), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .04) were significantly associated with decreased OS. Only lateral pelvic LN involvement was significantly associated with decreased RFS (P = .01).
Conclusion: For patients with clinical T4 rectal cancer, PE can provide an opportunity for long-term survival and good local control. Patients with lateral pelvic LN involvement should be offered adjuvant treatment pre- or postoperatively to improve prognosis after PE.
Similar articles
-
Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov;49(11):1663-72. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0714-z. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006. PMID: 17041749
-
Outcome of total pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer.Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):700-3. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003. PMID: 12828064
-
Efforts to improve local control in rectal cancer compromise survival by the potential morbidity of optimal mesorectal excision.J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Sep 20. J Am Coll Surg. 2006. PMID: 17084330
-
Pelvic exenteration: a perspective from a regional cancer center in India.Indian J Cancer. 2004 Jul-Sep;41(3):109-14. Indian J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15472408 Review.
-
Total mesorectal excision for middle and lower rectal cancer: a single institution experience with 337 consecutive patients.J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;86(3):115-21. doi: 10.1002/jso.20062. J Surg Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15170648 Review.
Cited by
-
Radiological assessment of persistent retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: An analysis of the United States Rectal Cancer Consortium.J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):818-828. doi: 10.1002/jso.26600. Epub 2021 Jul 16. J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34270097 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using S-1 plus Irinotecan for T4 lower rectal cancer.Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1250-z. Epub 2015 Sep 12. Surg Today. 2016. PMID: 26363781
-
Curative pelvic exenteration: initial experience and clinical outcome.Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Apr 13;44:170. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.44.170.37182. eCollection 2023. Pan Afr Med J. 2023. PMID: 37455871 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant CAPOX and bevacizumab alone for locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results from the N-SOG 03 trial.Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr;24(4):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1372-6. Epub 2018 Nov 23. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30471067 Clinical Trial.
-
Links between Inflammation and Postoperative Cancer Recurrence.J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 10;10(2):228. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020228. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33435255 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources