Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 15;151C(1):68-76.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30196.

Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality

Affiliations

Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality

Mary T White. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. .

Abstract

This article argues that to the extent that religious and spiritual beliefs can help people cope with genetic uncertainty, a limited spiritual assessment may be appropriate in genetic counseling. The article opens by establishing why genetic information is inherently uncertain and why this uncertainty can be medically, morally, and spiritually problematic. This is followed by a review of the range of factors that can contribute to risk assessments, including a few heuristics commonly used in responses to uncertainty. The next two sections summarize recent research on the diverse roles of religious and spiritual beliefs in genetic decisions and challenges to conducting spiritual assessments in genetic counseling. Based on these findings, religious and spiritual beliefs are posited as serving essentially as a heuristic that some people will utilize in responding to their genetic risks. In the interests of helping such clients make informed decisions, a limited spiritual assessment is recommended and described. Some of the challenges and risks associated with this limited assessment are discussed. Since some religious and spiritual beliefs can conflict with the values of medicine, some decisions will remain problematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrews LB, Fullarton JE, Holtzman NA, Motulsky AG, editors. Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 1994. p. 338. - PubMed
    1. Ahmed S, Atkin K, Hewison J, Green J. The influence of faith and religion and the role of religious and community leaders in prenatal decisions for sickle cell disorders and thalassaemia major. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2006;26:801–809. - PubMed
    1. Berry D. Methodological pitfalls in the study of religiosity and spirituality. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2005;27:628–647. - PubMed
    1. Cox SM, McKellin W. ‘There's this thing in our family’: Predictive testing and the construction of risk for Huntington Disease. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1999;21:622–646.
    1. Dehaene S. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 274.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources