Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 15;151C(1):41-51.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30201.

God and genes in the caring professions: clinician and clergy perceptions of religion and genetics

Virginia L Bartlett  1 , Rolanda L Johnson
Affiliations

God and genes in the caring professions: clinician and clergy perceptions of religion and genetics

Virginia L Bartlett et al. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. .

Abstract

Little is known about how care providers' perceptions of religion and genetics affect interactions with patients/parishioners. This study investigates clinicians' and clergy's perceptions of and experiences with religion and genetics in their clinical and pastoral interactions. This is an exploratory qualitative study designed to elicit care providers' descriptions of experiences with religion and genetics in clinical or pastoral interactions. Thirteen focus groups were conducted with members of the caring professions: physicians, nurses, and genetics counselors (clinicians), ministers and chaplains (clergy). Preliminary analysis of qualitative data is presented here. Preliminary analysis highlights four positions in professional perceptions of the relationship between science and faith. Further, differences among professional perceptions appear to influence perceptions of needed or available resources for interactions with religion and genetics. Clinicians' and clergy's perceptions of how religion and genetics relate are not defined solely by professional affiliation. These non-role-defined perceptions may affect clinical and pastoral interactions, especially regarding resources for patients and parishioners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Science and Faith
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson RR. Religious Traditions and Prenatal Genetics Counseling. 2002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayres L, Kavanaugh K, Knafl KA. Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qual Health Res. 2003;13:871–883. - PubMed
    1. Chapman AR. Unprecedented choices: religious ethics at the frontiers of genetic science. ix. Fortress Press; Minneapolis: 1999. p. 261.
    1. Clayton EW, Hannig VL, Pfotenhauer JP, Parker RA, Campbell PW, 3rd, Phillips JA., 3rd. Lack of interest by nonpregnant couples in population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:617–627. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. x. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks: 1996. p. 206.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources