Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;57(1):31-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x.

A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers

Affiliations

A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers

Adam D Schickedanz et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore barriers to multiple advance care planning (ACP) steps and identify common barrier themes that impede older adults from engaging in the process as a whole.

Design: Descriptive study.

Setting: General medicine clinic. San Francisco County.

Participants: One hundred forty-three English and Spanish speakers aged 50 and older (mean 61) enrolled in an advance directive preference study.

Measurement: Six months after reviewing two advance directives, self-reported ACP engagement and barriers to each ACP step were measured with open- and closedended questions using quantitative and qualitative (thematic content) analyses.

Results: Forty percent of participants did not contemplate ACP, 46% did not discuss with family or friends, 80% did not discuss with their doctor, and 90% did not document ACP wishes. Six barrier themes emerged: perceiving ACP as irrelevant (84%), personal barriers (53%), relationship concerns (46%), information needs (36%), health encounter time constraints (29%), and problems with advance directives (29%). Some barriers were endorsed at all steps (e.g., perceiving ACP as irrelevant). Others were endorsed at individual steps (e.g., relationship concerns for family or friend discussions, time constraints for doctor discussion, and problems with advance directives for documentation).

Discussion: Perceiving ACP to be irrelevant was the barrier theme most often endorsed at every ACP step. Other barriers were endorsed at specific steps. Understanding ACP barriers may help clinicians prioritize and address them and may also provide a framework for tailoring interventions to improve ACP engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Model Demonstrating Barriers to 4 Steps of the Advance Care Planning Process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sudore RL, Schickedanz AD, Landefeld CS, et al. Engagement in Multiple Steps of the Advance Care Planning Process: A Descriptive Study of Diverse Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearlman RA, Cole WG, Patrick DL, et al. Advance care planning: eliciting patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26:353–361. - PubMed
    1. Ramsaroop SD, Reid MC, Adelman RD. Completing an advance directive in the primary care setting: What do we need for success? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:277–283. - PubMed
    1. Morrison RS, Zayas LH, Mulvihill M, et al. Barriers to completion of health care proxies: an examination of ethnic differences. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2493–2497. - PubMed
    1. Morrison RS, Meier DE. High rates of advance care planning in New York City's elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2421–2426. - PubMed

Publication types