Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;30(8):2595-605.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20697.

Activated region fitting: a robust high-power method for fMRI analysis using parameterized regions of activation

Affiliations

Activated region fitting: a robust high-power method for fMRI analysis using parameterized regions of activation

Wouter D Weeda et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

An important issue in the analysis of fMRI is how to account for the spatial smoothness of activated regions. In this article a method is proposed to accomplish this by modeling activated regions with Gaussian shapes. Hypothesis tests on the location, spatial extent, and amplitude of these regions are performed instead of hypothesis tests of individual voxels. This increases power and eases interpretation. Simulation studies show robust hypothesis tests under misspecification of the shape model, and increased power over standard techniques especially at low signal-to-noise ratios. An application to real single-subject data also indicates that the method has increased power over standard methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Isocontours of an activated region. θ1 and θ2 define the center of the region; θ3, θ4, and θ5 (not shown) define the spatial extent of the region; θ6 (not shown) defines the amplitude of the region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized bias for location, spatial extent, and amplitude parameters as a function of signal‐to‐noise ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variance ratios for location and amplitude parameters of the different shape models (correct, pyramidal, and double) as a function of signal‐to‐noise ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion correct discoveries (power) for activated region fitting, Cluster size threshold, false discovery rate, and Bonferroni as a function of signal‐to‐noise ratio for three shape models [correct (a), pyramidal (b), and double (c)]. (a–c) The uncorrelated noise data. (d) The correlated noise data with the double model. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average activation (t‐values) of the left hemisphere from four runs of the experiment (unthresholded). Active voxels (based on FDR correction) are marked black. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 6
Figure 6
BIC values for 18 sequential models. The triangle indicates the best fitting model (13 regions). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 7
Figure 7
Activated region fitting solution with 13 active regions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bowman FD ( 2005): Spatio‐temporal modeling of localized brain activity. Biostatistics 6: 558–575. - PubMed
    1. Christoffels IK,Formisano E,Schiller NO ( 2007): Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech. Hum Brain Mapp 28: 868–879. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fears TR,Benichou J,Gail MH ( 1996): A reminder of the fallibility of the Wald statistic. Am Stat 50: 225–226.
    1. Flandin G,Penny W ( 2007): Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors. Neuroimage 34: 1108–1125. - PubMed
    1. Forman SD,Cohen JD,Fitzgerald M,Eddy WF,Mintum MA,Noll DC ( 1995): Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster‐size threshold. Magn Reson Med 33: 636–647. - PubMed

Publication types