Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov-Dec;123 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):21-6.
doi: 10.1177/00333549081230S304.

Patient perceptions and acceptance of routine emergency department HIV testing

Jeremy Brown  1 , Irene Kuo, Jennifer Bellows, Ryan Barry, Peter Bui, Joshua Wohlgemuth, Emily Wills, Nirav Parikh
Affiliations

Patient perceptions and acceptance of routine emergency department HIV testing

Jeremy Brown et al. Public Health Rep. 2008 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: We report on the rates of patient acceptance and their perceptions of routine emergency department (ED) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in a high-prevalence area.

Methods: We analyzed the race/ethnicity of patients who either accepted or declined a routine HIV test that was offered to all patients in the ED of a large academic center. We also distributed a patient perception survey about ED HIV testing.

Results: During the study period, an HIV screening test was offered to 9,826 patients. Of these, 5,232 patients (53%) accepted the test. The acceptance rate of HIV testing was highest among African American patients (55%), followed by 52% for white, 50% for Hispanic, and 42% for Asian patients. A total of 1,519 completed surveys were returned for analysis. The most common reasons for declining a test were that patients did not perceive themselves to be at risk for HIV (49%) or they had recently been tested for HIV (18%). Overall, 84% of patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test in the ED. When analyzed by ethnicity, 89% of African American patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test if the friend went to the ED, but only 74% of white patients would do so.

Conclusions: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 recommendations on HIV screening are well accepted by the target populations. Further work at explaining the risk of HIV infection to ED patients should be undertaken and may boost the acceptance rate of ED HIV screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall patient responses to the question, “In your opinion, do you agree that the ER is a good place to perform HIV screening?” (n=1,420)
HIV = human immunodeficiency virus ER = emergency room
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reasons for declining an emergency department HIV test (n=415)
HIV = human immunodeficiency virus ER = emergency room
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17. quiz CE1-4. - PubMed
    1. McKenna M. HIV testing: should the emergency department take part? Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:190–2. - PubMed
    1. Brown J, Shesser R, Simon G, Bahn M, Czarnogorski M, Kuo I, et al. Routine HIV screening in the emergency department using the new US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines: results from a high-prevalence area. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:395–401. - PubMed
    1. Stata Corp. Stata: Version 9.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corp.; 2007.
    1. Babcock Irvin C, Wyer PC, Gerson LW The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group. Preventive care in the emergency department, part II: clinical preventive services—an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1042–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms