BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy: the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial
- PMID: 19176440
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.2
BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy: the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial
Abstract
Context: It is uncertain whether intensified heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is superior to symptom-guided therapy.
Objective: To compare 18-month outcomes of N-terminal BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy.
Design, setting, and patients: Randomized controlled multicenter Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) of 499 patients aged 60 years or older with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction < or = 45%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of II or greater, prior hospitalization for heart failure within 1 year, and N-terminal BNP level of 2 or more times the upper limit of normal. The study had an 18-month follow-up and it was conducted at 15 outpatient centers in Switzerland and Germany between January 2003 and June 2008.
Intervention: Uptitration of guideline-based treatments to reduce symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (symptom-guided therapy) and BNP level of 2 times or less the upper limit of normal and symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (BNP-guided therapy).
Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were 18-month survival free of all-cause hospitalizations and quality of life as assessed by structured validated questionnaires.
Results: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP and symptom-guided therapy resulted in similar rates of survival free of all-cause hospitalizations (41% vs 40%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72-1.14]; P = .39). Patients' quality-of-life metrics improved over 18 months of follow-up but these improvements were similar in both the N-terminal BNP-guided and symptom-guided strategies. Compared with the symptom-guided group, survival free of hospitalization for heart failure, a secondary end point, was higher among those in the N-terminal BNP-guided group (72% vs 62%, respectively; HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P = .01). Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP improved outcomes in patients aged 60 to 75 years but not in those aged 75 years or older (P < .02 for interaction)
Conclusion: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP did not improve overall clinical outcomes or quality of life compared with symptom-guided treatment.
Trial registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN43596477.
Comment in
-
BNP-guided therapy for heart failure.JAMA. 2009 Jan 28;301(4):432-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.3. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19176447 No abstract available.
-
BNP-guided heart failure therapy in older patients.JAMA. 2009 May 27;301(20):2091-2; author reply 2092-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.694. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19470982 No abstract available.
-
BNP-guided heart failure therapy in older patients.JAMA. 2009 May 27;301(20):2091; author reply 2092-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.693. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19470983 No abstract available.
-
[Using PNP value-guided therapy for treatment of heart failure is not better than using symptom-guided therapy].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 Jul 29;98(15):845-6. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.15.845. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009. PMID: 19642070 German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical