Integrative approaches for assessing the ecological sustainability of in situ bioremediation
- PMID: 19178567
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00133.x
Integrative approaches for assessing the ecological sustainability of in situ bioremediation
Abstract
Application of microbial metabolic potential (bioremediation) is accepted as an environmentally benign and economical measure for decontamination of polluted environments. Bioremediation methods are generally categorized into ex situ and in situ bioremediation. Although in situ bioremediation methods have been in use for two to three decades, they have not yet yielded the expected results. Their limited success has been attributed to reduced ecological sustainability under environmental conditions. An important determinant of sustainability of in situ bioremediation is pollutant bioavailability. Microbial chemotaxis is postulated to improve pollutant bioavailability significantly; consequently, application of chemotactic microorganisms can considerably enhance the performance of in situ degradation. The environmental fate of degradative microorganisms and the ecological consequence of intervention constitute other important descriptors for the efficiency and sustainability of bioremediation processes. Integrative use of culture-dependent, culture-independent methods (e.g. amplified rDNA restriction analysis, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, denaturing/thermal gradient gel electrophoresis, phospholipid fatty acid, etc.), computational and statistical analyses has enabled successful monitoring of the above aspects. The present review provides a detailed insight into some of the key factors that affect the efficiency of in situ bioremediation along with a comprehensive account of the integrative approaches used for assessing the ecological sustainability of processes. The review also discusses the possibility of developing suicidal genetically engineered microorganisms for optimized and controlled in situ bioremediation.
Similar articles
-
Use of molecular techniques in bioremediation.Acta Microbiol Pol. 2001;50(3-4):205-18. Acta Microbiol Pol. 2001. PMID: 11930989 Review.
-
Suicidal genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation: need and perspectives.Bioessays. 2005 May;27(5):563-73. doi: 10.1002/bies.20220. Bioessays. 2005. PMID: 15832375
-
Exploiting the ecogenomics toolbox for environmental diagnostics of organohalide-respiring bacteria.Trends Biotechnol. 2010 Jun;28(6):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Apr 29. Trends Biotechnol. 2010. PMID: 20434786 Review.
-
Application of fingerprinting molecular methods in bioremediation studies.Methods Mol Biol. 2010;599:69-88. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-439-5_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2010. PMID: 19882280
-
Bioremediation: an important alternative for soil and industrial wastes clean-up.Indian J Exp Biol. 2003 Sep;41(9):1030-45. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003. PMID: 15242296 Review.
Cited by
-
Metabolomics Analysis Reveals the Participation of Efflux Pumps and Ornithine in the Response of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E Cells to Challenge with Propranolol.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 22;11(6):e0156509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156509. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27331395 Free PMC article.
-
Petroleum-Tolerant Rhizospheric Bacteria: Isolation, Characterization and Bioremediation Potential.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):2060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59029-9. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32029873 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of nitrate and ammonium fertilization on Zn, Pb, and Cd phytostabilization by Populus euramericana Dorskamp in contaminated technosol.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Dec;22(23):18759-71. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5071-9. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26199007
-
Biodegradation of spilled diesel fuel in agricultural soil: effect of humates, zeolite, and bioaugmentation.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 8;2014:642427. doi: 10.1155/2014/642427. eCollection 2014. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 24672346 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of fermentation medium for the production of atrazine degrading strain Acinetobacter sp. DNS(32) by statistical analysis system.J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:623062. doi: 10.1155/2012/623062. Epub 2012 Oct 3. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012. PMID: 23093851 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources