Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jan 30:338:a3026.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3026.

Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial

Pat Hoddinott et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a policy to provide breastfeeding groups for pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial with prospective mixed method embedded case studies to evaluate implementation processes.

Setting: Primary care in Scotland.

Participants: Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and babies registered with 14 of 66 eligible clusters of general practices (localities) in Scotland that routinely collect breastfeeding outcome data.

Intervention: Localities set up new breastfeeding groups to provide population coverage; control localities did not change group activity.

Primary outcome: any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks from routinely collected data for two pre-trial years and two trial years.

Secondary outcomes: any breast feeding at birth, 5-7 days, and 8-9 months; maternal satisfaction.

Results: Between 1 February 2005 and 31 January 2007, 9747 birth records existed for intervention localities and 9111 for control localities. The number of breastfeeding groups increased from 10 to 27 in intervention localities, where 1310 women attended, and remained at 10 groups in control localities. No significant differences in breastfeeding outcomes were found. Any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks declined from 27% to 26% in intervention localities and increased from 29% to 30% in control localities (P=0.08, adjusted for pre-trial rate). Any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks increased from 38% to 39% in localities not participating in the trial. Women who attended breastfeeding groups were older (P<0.001) than women initiating breast feeding who did not attend and had higher income (P=0.02) than women in the control localities who attended postnatal groups. The locality cost was pound13 400 (euro14 410; $20 144) a year.

Conclusion: A policy for providing breastfeeding groups in relatively deprived areas of Scotland did not improve breastfeeding rates at 6-8 weeks. The costs of running groups would be similar to the costs of visiting women at home.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44857041.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Timing and characteristics of intervention
None
Fig 2 Flowchart of participants. *Child Health Surveillance Programme (CHSP) 8-9 month infant feeding data ceased to be routinely collected during year 1 of the trial, with implementation of Health for all Children 4
None
Fig 3 Breastfeeding group meetings per 100 locality women initiating breast feeding per year. Median=46 (interquartile range 25-64). Change in breast feeding at 6-8 weeks from two years before intervention and two intervention years shown in brackets below locality
None
Fig 4 Women attending breastfeeding groups (pregnant or breastfeeding) per 100 locality women initiating breast feeding per year. Median=23 (interquartile range 19-30). Change in breast feeding at 6-8 weeks from two years before intervention and two intervention years shown in brackets below locality

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ip S, Cheung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007. (Evidence report/technology assessment report No 153.) - PubMed
    1. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victora CG. Evidence of the long-term effects of breastfeeding. Geneva: WHO, 2007.
    1. WHO. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. 2008. www.who.int/child_adolescent_health/topics/prevention_care/child/nutriti.... - PubMed
    1. Bolling K, Grant K, Hamlyn B, Thornton A. Infant feeding survey 2005. London: NHS Information Centre, 2007.
    1. Dyson L, McCormick F, Renfrew MJ. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(2):CDCD001688. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data