Refusal bias in HIV prevalence estimates from nationally representative seroprevalence surveys
- PMID: 19182677
- PMCID: PMC2695508
- DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283269e13
Refusal bias in HIV prevalence estimates from nationally representative seroprevalence surveys
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the relationship between prior knowledge of one's HIV status and the likelihood to refuse HIV testing in populations-based surveys and explore its potential for producing bias in HIV prevalence estimates.
Methods: Using longitudinal survey data from Malawi, we estimate the relationship between prior knowledge of HIV-positive status and subsequent refusal of an HIV test. We use that parameter to develop a heuristic model of refusal bias that is applied to six Demographic and Health Surveys, in which refusal by HIV status is not observed. The model only adjusts for refusal bias conditional on a completed interview.
Results: Ecologically, HIV prevalence, prior testing rates and refusal for HIV testing are highly correlated. Malawian data further suggest that amongst individuals who know their status, HIV-positive individuals are 4.62 (95% confidence interval, 2.60-8.21) times more likely to refuse testing than HIV-negative ones. On the basis of that parameter and other inputs from the Demographic and Health Surveys, our model predicts downward bias in national HIV prevalence estimates ranging from 1.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.9) for Senegal to 13.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.2-19.6) for Malawi. In absolute terms, bias in HIV prevalence estimates is negligible for Senegal but 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.3) percentage points for Malawi. Downward bias is more severe in urban populations. Because refusal rates are higher in men, seroprevalence surveys also tend to overestimate the female-to-male ratio of infections.
Conclusion: Prior knowledge of HIV status informs decisions to participate in seroprevalence surveys. Informed refusals may produce bias in estimates of HIV prevalence and the sex ratio of infections.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Underestimation of HIV prevalence in surveys when some people already know their status, and ways to reduce the bias.AIDS. 2013 Jan 14;27(2):233-42. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835848ab. AIDS. 2013. PMID: 22842993
-
Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys.BMC Public Health. 2009 May 28;9:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-163. BMC Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19476618 Free PMC article.
-
Nonresponse in repeat population-based voluntary counseling and testing for HIV in rural Malawi.Demography. 2010 Aug;47(3):651-65. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0115. Demography. 2010. PMID: 20879682 Free PMC article.
-
Refusal bias in HIV data from the Demographic and Health Surveys: Evaluation, critique and recommendations.Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):811-826. doi: 10.1177/0962280219844536. Epub 2019 May 9. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020. PMID: 31072213 Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Vaccination and all-cause child mortality from 1985 to 2011: global evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys.Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 1;182(9):791-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv125. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Am J Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26453618 Free PMC article.
-
Analyses of Sensitivity to the Missing-at-Random Assumption Using Multiple Imputation With Delta Adjustment: Application to a Tuberculosis/HIV Prevalence Survey With Incomplete HIV-Status Data.Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 15;185(4):304-315. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww107. Am J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28073767 Free PMC article.
-
On the assumption of bivariate normality in selection models: a Copula approach applied to estimating HIV prevalence.Epidemiology. 2015 Mar;26(2):229-37. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000218. Epidemiology. 2015. PMID: 25643102 Free PMC article.
-
Adjusting the HIV prevalence for non-respondents using mortality rates in an open cohort in northwest Tanzania.Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jun;19(6):656-663. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12304. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Trop Med Int Health. 2014. PMID: 24655037 Free PMC article.
-
Refusal bias in the estimation of HIV prevalence.Demography. 2014 Jun;51(3):1131-57. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0290-0. Demography. 2014. PMID: 24788481
References
-
- Kigadye RM, Klokke A, Nicoll A, Nyamuryekung'e KM, Borgdorff M, Barongo L, et al. Sentinel surveillance for HIV-1 among pregnant women in a developing country: 3 years' experience and comparison with a population serosurvey. AIDS. 1993;7:849–855. - PubMed
-
- Fylkesnes K, Ndhlovu Z, Kasumba K, Mubanga Musonda R, Sichone M. Studying dynamics of the HIV epidemic: population-based data compared with sentinel surveillance in Zambia. AIDS. 1998;12:1227–1234. - PubMed
-
- Glynn JR, Buve A, Carael M, Zaba B. Adjustment of antenatal clinic HIV surveillance data for HIV-associated differences in fertility. AIDS. 1999;13:1598–1599. - PubMed
-
- Zaba B, Boerma T, White R. Monitoring the AIDS epidemic using HIV prevalence data among young women attending antenatal clinics: prospects and problems. AIDS. 2000;14:1633–1645. - PubMed
-
- Glynn JR, Buve A, Carael M, Musonda RM, Kahindo M, Macauley I, et al. Factors influencing the difference in HIV prevalence between antenatal clinic and general population in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2001;15:1717–1725. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical