The views of gastroenterologists about the role of nurse endoscopists, especially in colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 19183151
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03936.x
The views of gastroenterologists about the role of nurse endoscopists, especially in colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Background: Nurse endoscopists may provide a solution for the insufficient endoscopic capacity in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.
Aim: To determine the views of gastroenterologists about the potential role of nurse endoscopists in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all registered gastroenterologists (n = 301) and gastroenterology residents (n = 79) in the Netherlands.
Results: Two hundred and thirty five of 380 (62%) gastroenterologists and residents completed the questionnaire. Overall, 48% were positive towards introduction of nurse endoscopists, whereas 18% were neutral and 34% negative. Respondents expected no major differences in endoscopic quality between physicians and nurse endoscopists. Nevertheless, 69% expected that patient experiences would be better met by physicians. Multivariate analysis showed that actual experience with nurse endoscopists and beliefs that nurse endoscopists are able to provide adequate endoscopic quality and good patient experiences, were independent predictors for a positive attitude towards introduction of nurse endoscopists [OR 6.6 (2.3-18.4), OR 1.9 (1.2-3.5) and OR 2.1 (1.2-2.9), respectively]. Respectively 89% and 66% of the respondents considered sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for CRC screening as appropriate procedures to be performed by nurse endoscopists. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies were considered less appropriate.
Conclusion: A majority of gastroenterologists have a positive attitude towards introduction of nurse endoscopists, especially for CRC screening endoscopies.
Similar articles
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00240.x. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006. PMID: 16412034
-
Survey of the opinions, knowledge, and practices of gastroenterologists regarding colorectal cancer screening and use of the fecal occult blood test.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec;95(12):3629-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03381.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 11151904
-
Comparisons of screening colonoscopy performed by a nurse practitioner and gastroenterologists: a single-center randomized controlled trial.Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):210-6. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31821ab5e6. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21637086 Clinical Trial.
-
Review article: colorectal cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis - what should we be doing?Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct;24 Suppl 3:56-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03062.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16961747 Review.
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer.Endoscopy. 2009 Mar;41(3):200-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119626. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19280531 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-Physician Endoscopy: How Far Can We Go?Visc Med. 2016 Feb;32(1):13-20. doi: 10.1159/000443623. Epub 2016 Feb 10. Visc Med. 2016. PMID: 27588291 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nurse's Roles in Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Narrative Review.J Prev (2022). 2022 Dec;43(6):759-782. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00694-z. Epub 2022 Aug 24. J Prev (2022). 2022. PMID: 36001253 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.004. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20833348 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous