Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan 30:9:4.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-4.

Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section

Affiliations

Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section

Behnaz Torkan et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section.

Methods: This was a prospective study. A sample of women with normal delivery and caesarean section from 5 health care centers in Isfahan, Iran were entered into the study. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 at two points in time (time 1: 6 to 8 weeks after delivery; time 2: 12 to 14 weeks after delivery). Data were analyzed to compare quality of life in the two study groups.

Results: In all 100 women were interviewed (50 with normal delivery and 50 with caesarean section). Postnatal quality of life in both groups was improved from time 1 to time 2. However, comparing the mean scores between the normal and caesarean delivery groups the results showed that in general the normal vaginal delivery group had a better quality of life for almost all subscales in both assessment times. The differences were significant for vitality (mean score 62.9 vs. 54.4 P = 0.03) and mental health (mean score 75.1 vs. 66.7, P = 0.03) at first assessment and for physical functioning (mean score 88.4 vs. 81.5, P = 0.03) at second evaluation. However, comparing the findings within each group the analysis showed that the normal vaginal delivery group improved more on physical health related quality of life while the caesarean section group improved more on mental health related quality of life.

Conclusion: Although the study did not show a clear cut benefit in favor of either methods of delivery that are normal vaginal delivery or caesarean section, the findings suggest that normal vaginal delivery might lead to a better quality of life especially resulting in a superior physical health. Indeed in the absence of medical indications normal vaginal delivery might be better to be considered as the first priority in term pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glanzener CMA, Abdolla M, Stroud P, Templeton A, Russell IT, Naji S. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, cause, prevention and treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:282–287. - PubMed
    1. Glanzener CM. Postpartum problems. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;58:313–316. - PubMed
    1. Anderson GM. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates. BMJ. 2004;329:696–697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7468.696. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M. Predictors of women's perceptions of the childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:24–34. - PubMed
    1. McCurt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective caesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00147.x. - DOI - PubMed