Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009;11(1):20-7.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9184-6. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

A randomized evaluation of bispectral index-augmented sedation assessment in neurological patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized evaluation of bispectral index-augmented sedation assessment in neurological patients

Daiwai M Olson et al. Neurocrit Care. 2009.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether monitoring sedation status using bispectral index (BIS) as an adjunct to clinical evaluation was associated with a reduction in the total amount of sedative drug used in a 12 h period.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Tertiary care neurocritical care unit.

Patients: Sixty-seven mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving continuous intravenous sedation with propofol.

Interventions: Sedation monitoring using clinical assessment with the Ramsay scale (Ramsay-alone group) or clinical assessment plus BIS monitoring (BIS-augmentation group). Subjects were randomized to Ramsay-alone (n = 35), or BIS-augmentation (n = 32). Nurses adjusted the dose of propofol to a Ramsay of 4, or a Ramsay of 4 and BIS between 60 and 70.

Measurements and main results: Patients in the BIS-augmentation group received significantly less propofol by volume (93.5 ml vs. 157.8 ml, respectively; P < .015), and had lower infusion rates (14.6 vs. 27.9 mcg/kg/min; P = .003). There is a lower risk of propofol infusion exceeding manufacturer's recommended dosing guides in the BIS-augmentation group versus the Ramsay-alone group (0 vs. 23%, P = .0052). The BIS-augmentation group woke up much quicker than those in the Ramsay-alone group (1.2 vs. 7.5 min; P < .0001).

Conclusions: BIS-augmented sedation monitoring resulted in a marked reduction in the total dose of sedative used to achieve the same level of clinical sedation resulting in shortened time to wake up without any measurable adverse effects. Physiologic sedation assessment tools may provide a useful means of improving the care of sedated critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of BIS values for subjects randomized to the BIS-augmentation group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Propofol infusion rates for the Ramsay-alone and BIS-augmentation group. Mean propofol infusion rates (mg/kg/h) are shown for each individual (with minimum and maximum hourly rates represented by vertical bars). Groups are separated by a space for visual clarity

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, et al. Clinical practice guide-lines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(1):119–141. - PubMed
    1. Arbour RB. Using the Bispectral Index to assess arousal response in a patient with neuromuscular blockade. Am J Crit Care. 2000;9(6):383–387. - PubMed
    1. Carrasco G. Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care. 2000;4(4):217–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G. The use of continuous I.V. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114(2):541–548. - PubMed
    1. Weinert CR, Chlan L, Gross C. Sedating critically ill patients: Factors affecting nurses’ delivery of sedative therapy. Am J Crit Care. 2001;10(3):156–165. quiz 166–157. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms