Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Aug;94(1):69-77.
doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9802-y. Epub 2009 Feb 1.

Quality of radiosurgery for single brain metastases with respect to treatment technology: a matched-pair analysis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Quality of radiosurgery for single brain metastases with respect to treatment technology: a matched-pair analysis

Berndt Wowra et al. J Neurooncol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: A comparison of treatment parameters and quality of clinical outcome in patients with single brain metastases treated with two different technologies for radiosurgery (Gamma Knife and CyberKnife).

Methods: Treatment parameters were statistically analyzed. Clinical outcome was assessed by matched-pair analysis based on the treatment device, differences in dose prescription, and the date of the treatment. Patients were matched according to their tumor size, age, gender, primary cancer, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score. Survival post-radiosurgery, local and distant tumor control, and complications were analyzed. Predictive factors were investigated.

Results: 423 single brain metastases were treated with Gamma Knife and 73 with CyberKnife. Tumor volumes were similar. The parameters minimum tumor dose, maximum tumor dose, prescription isodose volume, conformality index, homogeneity index, volume of tissue receiving a dose of 10 Gy or more were significantly larger in Gamma Knife group. Sixty-three patients were good matches. These showed the same pattern in parameters. Concerning the outcome analysis, only overall survival differed significantly between groups, twice as long with CyberKnife (P < 0.03). According to pooled data, dose was predictive of local failure, whole brain radiation therapy and chemotherapy were predictive of toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score was predictive of survival after radiosurgery, and date of treatment was predictive of overall survival. No factor predicted new brain metastases, including whole brain radiation therapy.

Conclusions: The most important result of this study was the finding that the obvious differences in treatment-related parameters between Gamma Knife and CyberKnife had no impact on the quality of the clinical outcome after radiosurgery. Survival time increased chronologically, presumably due to an intensified anti-cancer therapy in the more recent era of the CyberKnife treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1770-9 - PubMed
    1. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Aug;45(8):2331-42 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1):35-43 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2483-91 - PubMed
    1. Expert Rev Neurother. 2004 Jul;4(4):673-9 - PubMed