Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i22-7.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029355.

National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems

Affiliations

National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems

E Spencer et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This survey provides an overview of the development of policies and strategies for quality improvement in European healthcare systems, by mapping quality improvement policies and strategies, progress in their implementation, and early indications of their impact.

Study design: A survey of quality improvement policies and strategies in healthcare systems of the European Union was conducted in 2005 for the first phase of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) project.

Participants: The survey, completed by 68 key experts in quality improvement from 24 European Union member states, represents their views and accounts of quality improvement policies and strategies in their healthcare systems.

Principal findings: There are substantial international and intra-national variations in the development of healthcare quality improvement. Legal requirements for quality improvement strategies are an important driver of progress, along with the activities of national governments and professional associations and societies. Patient and service user organisations appear to have less influence on quality improvement. Wide variation in voluntary and mandatory coverage of quality improvement policies and strategies across sectors can potentially lead to varying levels of progress in implementation. Many healthcare organisations lack basic infrastructure for quality improvement.

Conclusions: Some convergence can be observed in policies on quality improvement in healthcare. Nevertheless, the growth of patient mobility across borders, along with the implications of free market provisions for the organisation and funding of healthcare systems in European Union member states, require policies for cooperation and learning transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Legido-Quigley H, McKee M, Walshe K, et al. How can quality of care be safeguarded across the European Union? BMJ 2008;336:920–3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertinato L, Busse R, Fahy N, et al. Cross Border Health Care in Europe. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2005
    1. Cucic S. European Union health policy and its implications for national convergence International J Qual Health Care 2000;12:217–25 - PubMed
    1. Federal Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs Quality in healthcare: opportunities and limits of cooperation at EU level, Report of meeting of European Union health ministers on quality in healthcare. Vienna: 1998
    1. Schweiger B, Pueringer U, Abbuhl BE, et al. Quality policy in health care systems of the EU Accession Candidates, Status quo and perspectives. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Social Security and Generations, 2001

Publication types

MeSH terms