Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country
- PMID: 19188628
- PMCID: PMC2630358
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071399
Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country
Erratum in
- CMAJ. 2009 Mar 3;180(5):541
Abstract
Background: Clandestine induced abortions are a public health problem in many developing countries where access to abortion services is legally restricted. We estimated the prevalence and incidence of, and risk factors for, clandestine induced abortions in a Latin American country.
Methods: We conducted a large population-based survey of women aged 18-29 years in 20 cities in Peru. We asked questions about their history of spontaneous and induced abortions, using techniques to encourage disclosure.
Results: Of 8242 eligible women, 7992 (97.0%) agreed to participate. The prevalence of reported induced abortions was 11.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9%-12.4%) among the 7962 women who participated in the survey. It was 13.6% (95% CI 12.8%-14.5%) among the 6559 women who reported having been sexually active. The annual incidence of induced abortion was 3.1% (95% CI 2.9%-3.3%) among the women who had ever been sexually active. In the multivariable analysis, risk factors for induced abortion were higher age at the time of the survey (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), lower age at first sexual intercourse (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.91), geographic region (highlands: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23-1.97; jungle: OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.41-2.31 [v. coastal region]), having children (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.98), having more than 1 sexual partner in lifetime (2 partners: OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23-2.09; > or = 3 partners: OR 2.79, 95% CI 2.12-3.67), and having 1 or more sexual partners in the year before the survey (1 partner: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.72; > or = 2 partners: OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.02). Overall, 49.0% (95% CI 47.6%-50.3%) of the women who reported being currently sexually active were not using contraception.
Interpretation: The incidence of clandestine, potentially unsafe induced abortion in Peru is as high as or higher than the rates in many countries where induced abortion is legal and safe. The provision of contraception and safer-sex education to those who require it needs to be greatly improved and could potentially reduce the rate of induced abortion.
Figures
Comment in
-
Transparency in the delivery of lawful abortion services.CMAJ. 2009 Feb 3;180(3):272-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081862. CMAJ. 2009. PMID: 19188618 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Incidence of induced abortions in Peru.CMAJ. 2009 May 26;180(11):1133; author reply 1133-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1090010. CMAJ. 2009. PMID: 19468125 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- United Nations. 2007. World abortion policies 2007. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division; 2007. Available: www.un.org/esa/population/publications/2007_Abortion_Policies_Chart/2007... (accessed 2008 Apr. 22).
-
- Singh S. Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet 2006;368:1887-92. - PubMed
-
- Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, et al. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007;370:1338-45. - PubMed
-
- Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2003. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization; 2007.
-
- Gogna M, Romero M, Ramos S, et al. Abortion in a restrictive legal context: the views of obstetrician-gynaecologists in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Reprod Health Matters 2002;10:128-37. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical