Eliminating biofilm from ureteral stents: the Holy Grail
- PMID: 19188775
- DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328323d6d2
Eliminating biofilm from ureteral stents: the Holy Grail
Abstract
Purpose of review: Biofilms continue to be a major limiting factor in the long-term use of ureteral stents, promoting the development of chronic infections and antibiotic resistance and encrustation. Apart from stent removal in conjunction with antibiotic therapy, there is currently no treatment proven successful for completely eradicating a biofilm-related infection, highlighting the need for continued research in this area.
Recent findings: Research continues to focus mainly on biofilm prevention, specifically the development of novel coatings comprising antibacterial, antifouling or bacterial signalling compounds. Notably, all three strategies have generated candidate coatings showing recent success both in vitro and in vivo.
Summary: Despite the current lack of a completely biofilm-resistant device, coating or treatment strategy, continued research into the causation of bacterial biofilm formation and the continued development of novel antibacterial, antifouling and antibiofilm compounds is promising. Future work should be aimed at more rigorous testing of candidate coatings from both physical and bacterial challenge standpoints as well as increased in-vivo investigation via clinical trials.
Similar articles
-
Diamond-like carbon coatings on ureteral stents--a new strategy for decreasing the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms?J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.016. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17437849
-
[Urinary catheter biofilm infections].Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2008 Apr;57(2):47-52. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2008. PMID: 18578409 Review. Czech.
-
Uropathogen interaction with the surface of urological stents using different surface properties.J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Jul 21. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19625060
-
Bacterial biofilm formation on urologic devices and heparin coating as preventive strategy.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Mar;23 Suppl 1:S67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.12.007. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004. PMID: 15037330
-
Technology insight: Novel ureteral stent materials and designs.Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004 Nov;1(1):44-8. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0014. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004. PMID: 16474466 Review.
Cited by
-
Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Mar;11(2):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0091-y. Curr Urol Rep. 2010. PMID: 20425092 Review.
-
Evaluation of madurahydroxylactone as a slow release antibacterial implant coating.Open Biomed Eng J. 2010;4:263-70. doi: 10.2174/1874120701004010263. Epub 2010 Nov 3. Open Biomed Eng J. 2010. PMID: 21625377 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of biofilms on morbidity associated with short-term indwelling ureteral stents: a prospective observational study.World J Urol. 2019 Aug;37(8):1703-1711. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2569-z. Epub 2018 Nov 27. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30483946
-
[Urinary tract infections and Urolithiasis].Urologe A. 2010 May;49(5):623-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2257-0. Urologe A. 2010. PMID: 20449779 Review. German.
-
Electrical microcurrent to prevent conditioning film and bacterial adhesion to urological stents.Urol Res. 2011 Apr;39(2):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0284-3. Epub 2010 Aug 5. Urol Res. 2011. PMID: 20686759
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials