The energy cost of ski mountaineering: effects of speed and ankle loading
- PMID: 19188892
The energy cost of ski mountaineering: effects of speed and ankle loading
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study is to determine the energy cost (EC) of ski mountaineering and its variation with speed and ankle loading.
Methods: Seven male skiers volunteered to participate in this study. Field tests (500 m, gradient 21%) were executed on packed snow at an altitude of about 1600 m. Measurements were carried out breath by breath by a portable gas analyzer. Energy cost of uphill skiing was calculated from the steady state VO(2). In the speed protocol each subject was asked to repeat the same route at three different speed levels. In the weight protocol, subjects were instructed to maintain the preferred speed for three trials on the same track while wearing different weight bands on their ankle.
Results: At the self-selected speed of 1.07+/-0.05 m s(-1) and without extra load beside the normal equipment, the mean value of EC on packed snow is 10.6+/-0.4 J kg(-1m)(-1). A percentage variation of the speed (%speed) produces a corresponding percentage variation of the energy cost %EC = 0.32 x %speed. The %EC as a function of the percentage of added load, %weight, with respect to the total weight of the subject, including ski, bindings, and boots is given by %EC = 1.71 x %weight.
Conclusions: Data obtained in the present study constitute the first quantitative description of EC for ski mountaineering and result higher than for walking or snowshoeing. Effects due to ankle loading appear negligible for recreational skiers, while they should be taken into account in agonistic competition.
Similar articles
-
Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Oct;116(10):2017-24. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3455-2. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27534770
-
Physiology of ski mountaineering racing.Int J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;32(11):856-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1279721. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Int J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 22012642
-
Energy cost and efficiency of ski mountaineering. A laboratory study.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010 Dec;50(4):400-6. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010. PMID: 21178925
-
Intermediate and long-term anaerobic performance of elite Alpine skiers.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Mar;27(3):305-9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995. PMID: 7752854 Review.
-
Ski Mountaineering-Scientific Knowledge of This New Olympic Sport: A Narrative Review.Curr Sports Med Rep. 2023 Feb 1;22(2):61-66. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000001038. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2023. PMID: 36757125 Review.
Cited by
-
Cell damage, antioxidant status, and cortisol levels related to nutrition in ski mountaineering during a two-day race.J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Jun 1;9(2):338-46. eCollection 2010. J Sports Sci Med. 2010. PMID: 24149705 Free PMC article.
-
Steeper or Faster? Tactical Dispositions to Minimize Oxygen Cost in Ski Mountaineering.Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jan 31;3:828389. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.828389. eCollection 2021. Front Sports Act Living. 2022. PMID: 35174324 Free PMC article.
-
Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the physiology of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 19;14:1159728. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1159728. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37153216 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Oct;116(10):2017-24. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3455-2. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27534770
-
Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3371-5. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27028127