National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes
- PMID: 19189192
- PMCID: PMC2659155
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes
Abstract
Background: Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law.
Methods: State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas.
Results: Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0).
Conclusions: While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.
Similar articles
-
United Ostomy Associations of America's Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: An Examination of Best-in-Practice Care for Ostomy Patients.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;49(5):462-468. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000909. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022. PMID: 36108230
-
Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: Research Validation of Standards of Care.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022 May-Jun 01;49(3):251-260. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000876. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35523241 Free PMC article.
-
Notices of Privacy Practices: a survey of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 documents presented to patients at US hospitals.Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):558-64. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163646.90393.e4. Med Care. 2005. PMID: 15908850
-
Legal Regulation of Psychosurgery: A Fifty-State Survey.J Leg Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;39(4):335-399. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2019.1688208. J Leg Med. 2019. PMID: 31940252 Review.
-
The rights of americans with mental illness.J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Aug;199(8):578-84. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318225f330. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011. PMID: 21814084 Review.
Cited by
-
Large Language Models for Pre-mediation Counseling in Medical Disputes: A Comparative Evaluation against Human Experts.Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Apr;31(2):200-208. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.200. Epub 2025 Apr 30. Healthc Inform Res. 2025. PMID: 40384071 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing knowledge of the patient bill of rights in central Saudi Arabia: a survey of primary health care providers and recipients.Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):151-5. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.151. Ann Saudi Med. 2012. PMID: 22366828 Free PMC article.
-
The FDA-Approved Essure Device Counseling Order Fails to Promote Patient Empowerment.Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e70-e73. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-01. Epub 2019 Apr 10. Health Lit Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31289791 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patient's Bill of Rights: Is it a Challenge for Quality Health Care in Saudi Arabia?Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 Sep-Dec;5(3):254-259. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_147_16. Epub 2017 Aug 21. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 30787798 Free PMC article.
-
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic.Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Jul 19;3(3):e170-e173. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190528-01. eCollection 2019 Jul. Health Lit Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31410388 Free PMC article.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJM200008243430823', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200008243430823'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10954770', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10954770/'}]}
- Mariner WK. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(8):592–96. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15744898', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15744898/'}]}
- Binette MJ. Patients’ bill of rights: legislative cure-all or prescription for disaster? North Carol Law Rev. 2003;81:653–96. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15270471', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15270471/'}]}
- Blaes P. Promotion and enforcement of patients’ rights. Med Law. 2004;23(2):289–97. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJM199803053381020', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199803053381020'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9487001', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9487001/'}]}
- Annas GJ. A national bill of patients’ rights. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(10):695–9. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11662219', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11662219/'}]}
- Monaghan JC. Whatever happened to the patient’s bill of rights? Med Econ. 1975;52(16):109–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical