Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Feb;106(2):99-108.
doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1863-3.

[Clinical findings and diagnostics of cone dystrophy]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Clinical findings and diagnostics of cone dystrophy]

[Article in German]
U Kellner et al. Ophthalmologe. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Cone dystrophies present with highly variable clinical findings and often limited retinal changes, which may lead to misdiagnosis. The purpose of the present review of the clinical presentation and diagnosis of cone dystrophies is to provide guidelines for improved patient care.

Methods: A literature search and evaluation of the clinical findings were carried out in 450 patients with cone dystrophy examined between 1986 and 2008.

Results: Characteristic signs are loss of visual acuity, photophobia and central scotoma. The diagnosis of cone dystrophy is determined by a full-field electroretinogram (ERG). Fundus and near-infrared autofluorescence as well as optical coherence tomography allow detection of retinal structural abnormalities even when findings from ophthalmoscopy are normal.

Conclusion: The diagnosis of cone dystrophy is difficult due to unspecific subjective symptoms and absence of characteristic ophthalmoscopic findings. The differential diagnosis of unexplained visual loss should include cone dystrophy and requires either a full-field or multifocal ERG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Apr;80(2):219-23 - PubMed
    1. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007 Feb 01;2:7 - PubMed
    1. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1992;1(2):105-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Dec;84(6):799-806 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):307-312.e2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources